My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - CUP - 516 S SANTA FE ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
11/07/2011
>
31A - CUP - 516 S SANTA FE ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:38:33 PM
Creation date
11/3/2011 1:00:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31A
Date
11/7/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BENDER READY-MIX CONCRETE MANUFACTURING PROJECT <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion <br />' or siltation on- or off-site? <br />Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project site is generally <br />' flat and has been disturbed by existing development. As stated in Responses 4.6(b) and 4.9(a), <br />construction-related erosion and siltation impacts would be less than significant upon implementation of <br />Mitigation Measure GEO-2. <br />' As stated above, the proposed project area is fully developed and industrialized. The site lacks <br />permanent on-site stormwater conveyance facilities, and drainage currently either sheet flows towards <br />South Santa Fe Street, ponds on-site, or is recycled along with wash water utilize during operations. <br />' Drainage that sheet flows off-site is conveyed by an existing gutter along South Santa Fe Street to an <br />existing concrete drainage channel located approximately 500 feet southeast of the project site .4 <br />' None of the improvements associated with the project would substantially alter drainage patterns at the <br />site. The proposed project would implement three segments of 24-inch bottomless trench that would <br />drain into landscaped areas or the proposed detention/desilting basin. These water quality <br />' improvements would result in a beneficial impact in relation to erosion and siltation on- and off-site. <br />Thus, long-term operational impacts would be less than significant. <br />' Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure GEO-2. No additional mitigation is required. <br />d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, including through the <br />' alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of <br />surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? <br />No Impact The proposed project site has been historically developed with industrial uses and has not <br />' been subject to substantial flooding due to the alteration of drainage patterns in the site vicinity. <br />Aesthetic, drainage, water quality, and.safety improvements associated with the project would not <br />substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site. Rather, beneficial impacts would occur since <br />the amount of pervious area would be increased due to proposed landscaping and water quality <br />features on-site. No impacts would occur in this regard. <br />' Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. <br />e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />' stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? <br />Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Refer to Responses 4.6(b) and 4.9(a), <br />4.9(c), and 4.9(d). Construction-related erosion and siltation impacts would be less than significant <br />' upon implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2. The project would result in beneficial impacts <br />related to long-term operations since drainage/water quality features would be implemented on-site, <br />and the amount of pervious area would be increased. Thus, impacts would be less than significant <br />' upon implementation of the recommended mitigation measure. <br />Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure GEO-2. No additional mitigation is required. <br /> <br /> <br />a CalCoast Engineering & Design Group, Hydrology Study, Bender Ready Mix, May 30, 2011. <br />JULY 2011 4.9-3 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY <br />31A-67
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.