Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Pr %ctAftrnatives Attachment 'A" <br />feature similar equipment and appurtenances as the proposed Project. In addition, the construction of <br />a lift station at Alternative Site No. 5 would require similar construction activities as the proposed <br />Project (including the need to construct a manhole within the South Bristol Street /West Segerstrom <br />Avenue intersection), and would follow a similar construction schedule. Development of a lift <br />station at Alternative Site No. 5 also would require the City to acquire private property to implement <br />a temporary construction easement, accommodate the proposed lift station, and provide easements <br />for proposed sewer lines (as discussed in Section 5.2.3), as the proposed lift station would be <br />constructed within the parking lot of an existing commercial retail center located at 3001 -3005 South <br />Bristol Street. <br />3.4.7.2 Summary Comparison of Environmental Effects <br />As summarized in Final EIR Table 5 -1 and described in detail in RDE1R Section 5.4.7, relocating the <br />proposed lift station to Alternative Site No. 5 would neither avoid nor reduce the proposed Project's <br />near -term significant and unavoidable construction - related impact at the intersection of South Bristol <br />Street and West Segerstrom Avenue, which would occur between the hours of 7:15 a.m. and 8:00 <br />a.m. and between the hours of 2:30 p.m. and 6:45 p.m. (Monday through Friday); in fact, under this <br />alternative the duration of Construction Configuration C.2 (and the significant unavoidable impact) <br />would increase due to the need to completely cross the West Segerstrom Avenue right -of -way. In <br />addition, development of a lift station at Alternative Site No. 5 would create new, significant near - <br />term impacts transportation /traffic due to inadequate parking capacity. Impacts related to air <br />quality /greenhouse gas emissions, noise, utilities and service systems, and water quality and <br />hydrology would be similar to the proposed Project. <br />3.4.7.3 Finding and Rationale for Alternative Site No. 5 <br />The City hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations <br />make Alternative Site No. 5 infeasible. <br />Alternative Site No. 5 would not avoid or substantially lessen the Project's near -term significant and <br />unavoidable construction- related impact at the intersection of South Bristol Street and West <br />Segerstrom Avenue, or any other impacts associated with the proposed Project. <br />Furthermore, this alternative would result in the elimination of approximately 27 parking spaces <br />during near -term construction resulting in a temporary deficiency of six (6) parking spaces for a <br />period of up to twelve (12) months. Because this alternative would result in inadequate parking <br />capacity at an existing commercial retail center during construction, it would substantially interfere <br />with and disrupt the existing commercial retail center that utilizes the parking lot, as well as fail to <br />meet the Project's objective of avoiding detrimental effects to existing businesses. Further, unlike <br />the proposed Project site where the City has an existing sewer easement, construction at this location <br />would require the City to acquire private property to provide easements for proposed sewer lines. <br />Finally, construction of the lift station at this location would replace currently developed, useable <br />land, in contrast to the proposed Project site, which is vacant and undeveloped. Based on these <br />considerations, the City rejects Alternative Site No. 5 as infeasible and finds that it would not avoid <br />or substantially lessen any significant effects of the Project. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(b).) <br />San Lorenzo Lift Station EIR (Project No. 06 -3510) <br />CEQA Findings of Fact /Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />55A -53 <br />3 -14 <br />