My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY - 2012 JPA 1ST AMEND
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
O
>
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA)
>
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY - 2012 JPA 1ST AMEND
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2020 9:29:36 AM
Creation date
3/8/2012 4:41:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
Orange County Fire Authority
Contract #
A-2012-037-01
Agency
City Manager's Office
Council Approval Date
3/5/2012
Notes
FILED WITH A-2012-037 Amends A-2012-037 Amended by A-2012-037-02, A-2013-177, A-2015-131
Document Relationships
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY - 2012 JPA - INCLUDES PROPOSAL
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\O\ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA)
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY - 2012 PROPERTY SALE
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\O\ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA)
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY - 2013 JPA (2ND AMEND)
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\O\ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA)
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA) JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AGREEMENT (AMENDED)-3RD AMENDMENT - 2015
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\O\ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY (OCFA)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Authority cost for operational services for that fiscal year compared to the capped <br />Service Charge for each cash contract City for that year. The difference between these <br />amounts shall be referred to as the "Five-Year Shortfall." <br />The data will be reviewed and analyzed jointly by the City Managers' <br />Technical Advisory Committee and City Managers' Budget & Finance Committee to <br />confirm the amount of the Five-Year Shortfall, if any, and to determine whether that <br />amount has exceeded the percentage thresholds set forth below which would in turn <br />trigger an adjustment of the Service Charge. If, after reviewing the data which has been <br />compiled, the joint Committees and the Authority cannot agree on the calculations or <br />the data used to calculate the amount of the Five-Year Shortfall, the Authority reserves <br />the right to retain an independent auditor to review the calculations and data. The <br />independent auditor's results as to the calculated amount of the Five-Year Shortfall shall <br />be final and binding. <br />Modifications to the Service Charge, if any, shall be as follows. If the Five- <br />Year Shortfall is less than seven and one half percent (7.5%) of the actual annual <br />Authority costs, for a cash contract City, no additional amounts shall be owed by the <br />City. If any Five-Year Shortfall exceeds seven and one half percent (7.5%), a cash <br />contract City shall pay for the portion of the shortfall necessary to reduce the shortfall <br />below seven and one half percent (7.5%). If the Five-Year Shortfall is between seven <br />and one half percent (7.5%) and fifteen percent (15%), the amount shall be paid in its <br />entirety in the following fiscal year. If the Five-Year Shortfall is more than fifteen percent <br />(15%), that amount shall be paid through equal amortized installments over the <br />subsequent five year period. Payment of the Five-Year Shortfall in excess of seven and <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />554584.\ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.