My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-007 SA
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY (formerly known as Community Redevelopment Agency)
>
2012
>
2012-007 SA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2012 2:59:59 PM
Creation date
8/29/2012 2:59:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2012-007 SA
Date
8/20/2012
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana Successor Agency Dispute on Overall Project Costs Items: <br />In our first two ROPS, DOF moved legitimate project costs into "Administrative" costs. This was <br />contrary to DOF's own position (set forth in "Exhibit 4" on the DOF webpage devoted to ABX1 <br />26 issues) which treats such costs as "specific project implementation activities such as <br />construction inspection, project management or actual construction [which] would not be viewed <br />by Finance as `administrative."' Recently enacted AB 1484 further reinforces this position. <br />Thus, project costs from our prior two ROPS need to backed out of the "Administrative Cost <br />Allowance," and our ROPS allocations and Administrative Budgets recalculated accordingly. <br />SA Resolution No. 2012-007 <br />Page 12 of 24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.