My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31B - CUP - 1901 NORTH FAIRVIEW ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
09/04/2012
>
31B - CUP - 1901 NORTH FAIRVIEW ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2016 1:46:24 PM
Creation date
8/30/2012 12:38:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31B
Date
9/4/2012
Destruction Year
2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana <br />Environmental Checklist <br />Less -than- <br />Significant <br />Potentially Impact with Less -than- <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />XI. Mineral Resources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Would the project: <br />a. Result in the loss of availability of a known ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />mineral resource that would be of value to the <br />region and the residents of the state? <br />b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />important mineral resource recovery site <br />delineated on a local general plan, specific <br />plan, or other land use plan? <br />Discussion <br />Would the project: <br />a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the <br />region and the residents of the state? <br />No Impact. According to the City of Santa Ana Land Use Element, there are no areas identified as <br />having significant mineral resources and no areas having a Significant Mineral Aggregate Resource <br />Areas (SMARA) designation within the vicinity of the project site or within the City. Therefore, <br />implementation of the proposed project would not contribute to the loss of availability of a known <br />mineral resource. No impact would occur. <br />b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated <br />on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? <br />No Impact. As discussed in XLa, the City's General Plan Land Use Element states that there are no <br />mineral extraction activities in the City. As a result, implementation of the project would not result <br />in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. No impact would <br />occur. <br />The Academy Charter High School June 2012 <br />Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 -70 ICF00914.11 <br />iffl:a Me, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.