Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana <br />Environmental Checklist <br />utilities depends on the service area and capacity of each utility provider and the amount of <br />increased demand for utility services from the proposed project, as well as related projects; and if <br />this combined demand could reduce the availability of utility services. The service areas of the OCSD <br />(wastewater), Santa Ana Public Works Agency (stormwater), Santa Ana Public Works Agency Water <br />Resources Division and Metropolitan (water supply), and OCIWMD (solid waste) encompass the <br />project site and surrounding area. <br />Many of the projects identified in Table 3 -32 involve new or expanded land uses that may result in <br />additional demand on utilities and service systems. These projects would likely require additional <br />utility capacity. The construction of more capacity in various utility lines would be carried out as <br />part of the individual projects or part of the City's infrastructure improvement plans. As discussed in <br />Section XVII, "Utilities and Service Systems," all utility service providers project to have adequate <br />capacity to meet demands resulting from present and reasonably foreseeable future projects. <br />The proposed project would result in less- than - significant cumulative impacts on utilities and <br />service systems. The proposed project would not require expansion or construction of new <br />stormwater drainage facilities. Implementation of the proposed project will include project design <br />features identified in Response IX(a) that will minimize runoff off site flows to existing stormwater <br />facilities. <br />The proposed project would not result in increased water demands requiring new or expanded <br />entitlements of water supply. The proposed project is anticipated to utilize 43.4% less water than <br />what was used daily by the previous medical uses on the site. Likewise, the anticipated peak flow, <br />which is the amount of water that would need to be transmitted at one time through the <br />infrastructure and to the project site, would also be 43.4% less than what was delivered at peak flow <br />under the previous land uses. Because the project would utilize less water daily and annually than <br />the previous site use, impacts to the water utility would not occur and would not result in <br />cumulative impacts. <br />As discussed in Section XVII, "Utilities and Service Systems," the proposed project is expected to be <br />served from an upgraded sewer system that has been previously planned as part of the City's Sewer <br />Master Plan, and is required per Mitigation Measure UTL -1, prior serving the project. Because <br />project flows would be served by the improved sewer system and flows from the site will not be <br />substantial in comparison to the treatment plant design capacity, the proposed project would not <br />result in cumulative impacts to sewer or wastewater treatment facilities. <br />In summary, the project's incremental contribution to the service demands of the utilities serving <br />the project area is less than significant. Further, the project's contribution to utility service needs is <br />not cumulative considerable and the proposed project would not result in significant cumulative <br />utilities and service systems impacts. <br />Transportation and Traffic <br />The cumulative setting for transportation and traffic impacts includes all of the projects listed on <br />Table 3 -32. The traffic generated from the cumulative projects is provided in Table 3 -34. The traffic <br />cumulative analysis was prepared as part of the TIA (Appendix C), and includes the five <br />intersections analyzed for the proposed project that occur within the project vicinity. The traffic <br />implications of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects include two near -term <br />scenarios for the years 2013 and 2019 for Phase I and Phase 11, respectively, and a long -term <br />scenario for the year 2035. Thresholds for impacts are determined in the same method as the <br />The Academy Charter Nigh School 3 317 June 2012 <br />Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration ICE 0092012 <br />•T0J <br />