My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55B - RESO - OPPOSE CA PROP 32
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
10/01/2012
>
55B - RESO - OPPOSE CA PROP 32
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 6:12:54 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 4:36:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
55B
Date
10/1/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROPOSITION POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS BY PAYROLL DEDUCTION. <br />32 CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. <br />OFFICIAL TITLE AND SUMMARY PREPARED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL <br />POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS BY PAYROLL DEDUCTION. CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES. INITIATIVE <br />STATUTE. <br />• Prohibits unions from using payroll-deducted funds for political purposes. Applies same use prohibition to <br />payroll deductions, if any, by corporations or government contractors. <br />• Permits voluntary employee contributions to employer-sponsored committee or union if autho_ized yearly, <br />in writing. <br />• Prohibits unions and corporations from contributing directly or indirectly to candidates and candidate- <br />controlled committees. <br />• Other political expenditures remain unrestricted, including corporate expenditures from available <br />resources not limited by payroll deduction prohibition. <br />• Prohibits government contractor contributions to elected officers or officer-controlled committees. <br />Summary of Legislative Analyst's Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact: <br />• Increased costs to state and local government---potentially exceeding $1 million annually-to implement <br />and enforce the measure's requirements. <br />ANALYSIS BY THE LEGISLATIVE ANALYST <br />BACKGROUND <br />Political Refomn Act. California's Political Reform <br />Act of 1974, an initiative adopted by the voters, <br />established the state's campaign finance and <br />disclosure laws. The act applies to state and local <br />candidates, ballot measures, and officials, but does <br />not apply to federal candidates or officials. The <br />state's Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) <br />(1) enforces the requirements of the act, including <br />investigating alleged violations, and (2) provides <br />administrative guidance to the public by issuing <br />advice and opinions regarding FPPC's interpretation <br />of the act. <br />Local Campaign Finance Laws. In addition to <br />the requirements established by the act, some local <br />governments have campaign finance and disclosure <br />requirements for local candidates, ballot measures, <br />and officials. These ordinances are established and <br />enforced by the local government. <br />Political Spending. Many individuals, groups, <br />and businesses spend money to support or <br />oppose state and local candidates or ballot <br />measures. This political spending can take <br />different forms, including contributing money to <br />candidates or committees, donating services to <br />campaigns, and producing ads to communicate <br />opinions. Under state campaign finance laws, <br />there are three types of political spending: <br />Political Contribnuions. The term political <br />"contribution" generally includes giving money, <br />goods, ^ ^rvices (1) directly to a candidate, (2) at <br />the request of a candidate, or (3) to a committee <br />that uses these resources to support or oppose a <br />candidate or ballot measure. Current law limits the <br />amount of political contributions that individuals, <br />groups, and businesses may give to a state <br />candidate (or to committees that give money to a <br />state candidate). In 2012, for example, a i individual, <br />group, or business could contribute up to $26,000 <br />to a candidate for Governor and up to $3,900 to a <br />candidate for a legislative office. In addition, <br />current law requires political contributions to be <br />disclosed to state or local election officials. <br />Independent Expenditums. Money spent to <br />communicate support or opposition of a candidate <br />or ballot measure generally is considered an <br />independent expenditure if the funds are spent in a <br />way that is not coordinated with (1) a candidate or <br />(2) a committee established to support or oppose a <br />candidate or a ballot measure. For example, <br />developing a television commercial urging voters to <br />"vote for" a candidate is an independent <br />expenditure if the commercial is made without <br />coordination with the candidate's campaign. <br />Current law does not limit the amount of money <br />indivie.-,ais, groups, and businesses may spend on <br />independent expenditures. These expenditures, <br />however, must be disclosed to election officials. <br />28 1 Title and Summary / Analysis <br />55B-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.