My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SA_FULL PACKET_2012-10-01
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
SUCCESOR AGENCY (2012 - PRESENT)
>
2012
>
10/01/2012
>
SA_FULL PACKET_2012-10-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2013 9:02:48 AM
Creation date
10/1/2012 8:56:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Date
10/1/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
such "new" obligations in Section 34177.3(a), which states: "Successor agencies shall lack the <br />authority to, and shall not, create new enforceable obligations under the authority of the <br />Community Redevelopment Law ... or begin new redevelopment work, except in compliance <br />with an enforceable obligation that existed prior to June 28, 2011."5 <br />In response to the DOF's position that the Settlement Agreements are not enforceable <br />obligations, a lawsuit has been filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of <br />Sacramento (Gerald Peebler, et al, v. State of California Department of Finance et al, Case No. <br />34-2012-80001172). <br />Santa Ana Successor Agency Dispute on <br />ROPS #s 68 - 85 (Housing Project <br />Implementation Items): <br />Items 68, 69, & 74-85 - These obligations are partially fulfilled, ongoing projects. The former <br />RDA entered into these obligations prior to June 28, 2011 to be paid from the LMIHF to increase <br />and improve the project area's supply of affordable housing. The Successor Agency has <br />continued obligations pursuant to the project agreements, and is requesting the necessary funding <br />to complete the projects, including Successor Agency's direct project expenses associated with <br />staffing and professional costs. We are requesting these expenses be paid from RPTTF as the <br />LMIHF no longer exists under the law. <br />Items 70 - 73 - These are approved EOs that have financial obligations, and require project costs <br />be funded, including project management, construction management and other project <br />implementation and oversight services. DOF disallowed the source of payment on the last <br />ROPS, thus a different source of payment has been identified, as applicable. <br />Santa Ana Successor Agency Dispute on <br />ROPS #35 & 36 (SA Venture Agmnts.): <br />The ROPS includes the outstanding obligation of the Former Agency (and therefore the <br />Successor Agency) under the S.A. Venture Agreement to pay certain transportation impact fees <br />("Fees") in the event Santa Ana Venture (the third party oblige under the S.A. Venture <br />Agreement referred to in this letter as the "Developer") constructs additional retail and/or office <br />Emphasis added. <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />3-22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.