My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25D - AGMT - MANAGED PRINT SRVS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2012
>
10/15/2012
>
25D - AGMT - MANAGED PRINT SRVS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2012 2:42:37 PM
Creation date
10/11/2012 2:42:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Finance & Management Services
Item #
25D
Date
10/15/2012
Destruction Year
2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approval of Managed Print Services Agreement <br />October 15, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br />On June 18, 2012, the Purchasing Division issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Managed <br />Print Services. Current and local City of Santa Ana vendors were notified of the posting. Key <br />components and submittal requirements of the RFP included: <br />• Company profile demonstrating capability and experience in Managed Print Services <br />• Submission of audited financial statements <br />• Willingness to commit to cost per click (all inclusive program) <br />• Agreement to terms and conditions specified in the RFP <br />In response to inquiries and questions asked by vendors, the City released three addendums to <br />the initial RFP. On July 12, 2012 nine proposals were received and evaluated. The four-member <br />evaluation committee representing the Police Department, the Parks, Recreation and Community <br />Services Agency, and both the Central Services and Information Services Divisions of the FMSA <br />rated the proposals using three criteria: <br />1. Responsiveness to the RFP <br />2. Experience of the firm and personnel <br />3. Cost of proposal <br />The focus of the evaluation process was to select the proposal that provided the most thorough <br />and competitive program design that met the performance standards set forth in the RFP. Of the <br />nine submissions, the committee determined that four vendors met or exceeded each of the RFP <br />requirements (70 percent or above). The four vendors (C3 Office Solution, Mr. Copy, Sharp <br />Business Technologies and SoCal Office Technologies) were invited to a clarification interview <br />on August 16, 2012 and were advanced to Phase II of the process. <br />In Phase II, the four proposals were evaluated on 14 categories outlined in the RFP. The <br />categories were assigned a weighted percentage, based on the item's relative importance. A final <br />score for each proposal was derived by taking the average of each evaluator's total score. Using <br />this methodology, the highest numerical score reflects the best proposal. <br />Vendor Final Score % Rankin Proposal <br />C3 Office Solutions 85.0% 1 Committee Recommended <br />Sharp Business Systems 75.5% 2 <br />SoCal Office Technologies 73.5% 3 <br />Mr. Co 72.0% 4 <br />By definition, all the proposals that were advanced to Phase II received at least a 70 percent <br />score in the category of responsiveness to the RFP. However, there were noticeable differences <br />that ranked C3 Office Solution above the others. Among them, C3 Office Solutions represents a <br />wide range of printer manufacturers, allowing the City to continue to offer varied equipment to <br />meet specific needs of individual departments. Additionally, their service technicians are certified <br />trained to maintain the City's currently-owned fleet of copiers and printers. C3 Office Solutions <br />will offer the City a "boutique style" service that provides the flexibility that the City requires. <br />25D-2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.