My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25D - AGMT - TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNC
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
01/22/2013
>
25D - AGMT - TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2013 11:38:11 AM
Creation date
1/17/2013 5:02:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25D
Date
1/22/2013
Destruction Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C-2-1992 <br /> ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br /> that do not pass the limit line for counting purposes during the count time <br /> period shall also be counted as part of the quarter hour period in which they <br /> occur. . <br /> c. TMCs, supplied by an alternate viable source, for an intersection that are s 2 <br /> years of age may used in lieu of a manual count. <br /> <br /> 5. All counts shall be summarized in MS Excel 2007 format. Copies of the raw data <br /> count sheets will be provided to each involved AGENCY. <br /> Deliverables - Task 2: <br /> 1. Report summarizing data collection effort, including intersection turning counts, <br /> traffic collision analysis, current traffic signal timing patterns, and drawings of <br /> intersection features. <br /> 2. Electronic versions of all data files (See CTFP Guidelines for ROADS requirements) <br /> 3. Raw video footage of intersections receiving Video Counting to OCTA only. <br /> 4. Deliverables of Task 1 and Task 2 to AGENCIES shall be limited to political <br /> boundaries. <br /> <br /> <br /> Task 3: Field Review, Plans Specifications and Estimates, Design Standards and <br /> Requirements <br /> 1. CONSULTANT shall review the geometric layout, existing traffic signal <br /> equipment and signal synchronization related infrastructure, and identify any <br /> deficiencies for each intersection and along the whole corridor. The review shall <br /> include an assessment of the existing intersection geometry, traffic conditions, <br /> and traffic signal control equipment and telemetry/interconnect facilities along the <br /> corridor and of each intersection using observation, available as-built plans, <br /> consultation with the local AGENCIES, and AGENCY supplied aerial photos. <br /> CONSULTANT will use a standard field form developed by CONSULTANT for <br /> this review that accounts for each piece of intersection data required. With <br /> permission of the local AGENCIES, CONSULTANT will inspect the interior of <br /> each traffic control cabinet, inspect the telemetry systems and determine their <br /> respective 'condition and make recommendations for equipment upgrades. <br /> CONSULTANT is advised that certain infrastructure and equipment upgrades <br /> have been identified previously by the AGENCIES and reviewed by the APM and <br /> shall be a requirement of this project. These items are identified subsequently <br /> within this document. <br /> 2. CONSULTANT shall also include an identification of all planned and programmed <br /> improvements (widening projects, intersection improvements, etc.) on the study <br /> corridor. The identification of these projects should be at minimum a list summarizing <br /> all improvements. <br /> <br /> 3. Key components of the corridor review shall include, at minimum, the following: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br /> 2501-22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.