Laserfiche WebLink
i City of Santa Ana <br />Updated Proposal for the 301 East Jeanette Lane <br />:?aaolj Residential Project Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />VII. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS <br />This proposal shall be valid for a period of 90 days. Progress billings will be forwarded based on payment criteria <br />established by the City, These billings will include the fees earned for the billing period. The City shall make every <br />reasonable effort to review invoices within fifteen (15) working days from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify <br />Consultant in writing of any particular item that is alleged to be incorrect. <br />The fees proposed herein shall apply until January 1, 2014. Due to annual Increases in costs associated with inflation, staff <br />wage increases and increases in direct costs, Consultant will increase those portions of the contract fee for which work <br />must still be completed after January 1, 2014, by fifteen percent (15%). <br />Deviations or modifications from the Scope of Work will result in potential re-evaluation of the associated fees, Items not <br />specifically stated in the proposal will be considered an additional work item. <br />All work will be performed at a "Not to Exceed" contract price, which will become the fixed price upon completion of <br />negotiations with the City staff authorized to negotiate and agreement. The total budget includes all miscellaneous costs <br />for travel/mileage, reproduction, telephone, postal, delivery, reference materials, and incidental expenses. <br />The budget provides a breakdown of our estimated cost of performing the services described in this Scope of Services. <br />Our Scope of Services and its associated cost are based on several key assumptions, including the following: <br />1. City will develop the mailing list for distribution of the MND and notices. The City will be responsible for <br />newspaper cost of publication of notices, which will be billed directly to the City, so they are not included in the <br />proposed budget. <br />2. Photocopy costs included in the proposal are for the specified number of copies of deliverables and reasonable <br />incidental and in-team photocopying. If additional copies of deliverables are needed, they can be provided with <br />an amendment to the proposed budget. <br />3. Review cycles for preliminary documents are preserLted in the scope of work. Additional review cycles or <br />additional versions of administrative drafts are assumed to not be needed. <br />4. The proposed work addresses CEQA requirements of the proposed action. Work related to NEPA compliance, <br />Section 404 compliance, orother permitting processes is not included (although these can be added, as needed, <br />with a contract amendment). Work concludes at the acceptance by the City of the final deliverable. <br />5. The budget is based on completion of work within an agreed upon schedule. If substantial delay occurs, an <br />amendment of the budget would be warranted to accommodate additional project management time and other <br />costs. Substantial delay is normally defined as 90 days or more, <br />6. Costs are included for the number of meetings specified in the scope of work. If additional meetings are needed, <br />they can be included with an amendment of the budget, <br />7. The extent of public comment on an MIND is not predictable. The proposed budget includes a reasonable, <br />preliminary estimate time to respond to comments. RBF will consult with the City after the valuation of the <br />comments to determine if the preliminarily estimated budget is sufficient. An excessive amount of comments is <br />generally considered to be more than ten (10) commenting agencies/individuals and/or over 30 comments that <br />require answers other than "Comment is noted." <br />8. Costs have been allocated to tasks to determine the total budget. RBF may reallocate costs among tasks, as <br />needed, as long as the total budget is not exceeded. <br />9. Once the proposed project description is approved by the City for analysis in the Initial Study, it is assumed they <br />will not change thereafter. If changes requiring revisions to analysis or rewriJng of initial Study information occur, <br />an amendment of the budget would be warranted. <br />JN 132203 9 25 • February 25, 2013 <br />25C-25