Laserfiche WebLink
Pj� <br />Mr. Vince C. Fregoso <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />demolished, including the residence and orchard, which will affect the property's eligibility and <br />listing. As a result, the project will be examined and analyzed to see if it could follow the Secretary <br />of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation to determine if impacts can be brought to a level of less than <br />significant. Mitigation measures may be developed to lessen the project's impacts; however, there <br />may still be a significant impact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations would have to be <br />prepared as part of the CEQA assessment. Additionally, since ;tis likely there will be significant <br />public and agency comments regarding the proposed impactsfi, ,.oii this project to a locally listed <br />historic resource, our efforts associated with this analysis will be increased to substantiate the <br />findings and to minimize possible CEQA challenges to the d0:Cument. <br />Analysis of the new Hybrid Alternative will also be incorporated uito..the environmental document <br />and will consider whether the Sextinger property. Would retain its eligibility for listing to the City of <br />Santa Ana's Register of Historic Properties, as `well as whether the project would impact the <br />historical resource. Future uses of the residence; and the orchard areas``wi11 be considered to <br />determine if a change in use could cause a significant impact Further, since .the orchard is an <br />important part of the property, the removal, relocation, of development near the trees'could impact its <br />significance. <br />Assumptions: <br />1. URS will provide an electronic copy 'of the Revised Draft EIR,for the City staff review and <br />comment. <br />2. URS will address, and incorporate one (1) round of comprehensive department -coordinated <br />continents provided. by the City on the Revised Draft EIR. <br />3...URS assumes no chitiges will be fade to the: original project description or to any portions <br />of the ;Revised Diaff ;EIR not related to'the additional alternative. <br />TASK 04 — NOTICING AND RE CIRCULATION OF DRAFT EIR <br />URS will prepare: a Notice of Availability . (NOA) for the revised Draft EIR. The NOA will be <br />,.,a;ra.r hu.zruc ,,,A reaizlar mail to.those identified on the Distribution List, as previously provided by <br />the City. <br />URS will coordrnate'ahe reproduction of hard copies of the Draft EIR document. URS will provide <br />to the City 25.;hard:eopies.;of the�Draft EIR and 25 CDs with Appendix B: Technical Studies. URS <br />will also provide 10 CDs with the PDF version of the Draft EIR. <br />URS will coordinate with the State of California, Office of Planning and Research, State <br />Clearinghouse and prepare 15 Executive Summaries, 15 CDs of the EIR document, and copy of the <br />NOA. URS will submit the package to the State Clearinghouse via overnight delivery. <br />Assumptions: <br />1. URS will provide the City an electronic copy of the NOA for review. <br />