Laserfiche WebLink
January 4, 2013 <br />Page 2 <br />Environmental <br />TASK 1. ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES <br />No change; this task is complete. <br />TASK 2. DATA COLLECTION <br />Data Collection was completed for the initial phase of the environmental document. Extras below are requested <br />to address data collection associated with project revisions. <br />Work Completed Out of Scope <br />■ This task includes several revisions to property take tables, verification and coordination between exhibits and <br />tables. Collecting additional data during multiple project revisions. <br />— Additional budget: $4,680 <br />TASK 3. INITIAL STUDY <br />Work Completed Out of Scope <br />■ Prior to submittal of the screencheck Initial Study revisions were made to respond to changes in the project. <br />After submittal of the first screencheck document (8/16/12), four more unanticipated rounds of document <br />review /revisions were conducted (submittals 9/18, 9/24, 9/26 and 9/28 (final version). The majority of the <br />revisions responded to City request for significantly greater detail and to ongoing changes to the alignment <br />and property take. The extras for this task include numerous revisions to both text and figures. <br />— Additional budget: $10,340 <br />TASK 4. NOP <br />Work Completed Out of Scope <br />■ The NOP was translated from English to Spanish <br />— Additional budget: $350 <br />TASK S. ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR <br />The Administrative Draft EIR is in progress. Based on the following assumptions, there are no changes to the <br />budget for this task: <br />• The initial submittal of Administrative Draft EIR will include all sections except the Executive Summary and <br />Project Alternatives. Upon consultation with City staff and concurrence on the project alternatives, the <br />remaining sections will be completed and submitted. <br />• The alternatives analysis will include the 'No Project' alternative and up to three additional alternatives selected <br />on CEQA criteria (ability to attain most of the project objectives and reduce or eliminate one or more <br />significant impacts). The alternatives may be design alternatives or potentially construction- related (phasing, <br />equipment, etc.) alternatives. <br />• The EIR will include a background discussion of the alternatives prepared and presented to the public during <br />the design process. Unless one of these alternatives has the potential to reduce or eliminate a significant <br />environmental impact associated with the preferred alignment, it is not anticipated that these alternatives will <br />be reviewed in detail. No technical analysis (e.g., air quality, greenhouse gases, noise, traffic, etc., is anticipated <br />for the alternate alignments presented to the public. <br />