My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PLANNING CENTER, THE 8F - 2013
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2020
>
PLANNING CENTER, THE 8F - 2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2017 3:53:26 PM
Creation date
9/19/2013 10:58:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
PLANNING CENTER, THE
Contract #
A-2013-025
Agency
PUBLIC WORKS
Council Approval Date
2/4/2013
Expiration Date
6/30/2014
Insurance Exp Date
7/1/2014
Destruction Year
2020
Notes
Amends A-2007-167, A-2008-139, -001, -002, -003, A-2012-074 Amended by A-2013-025-01
Document Relationships
PLACEWORKS FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE PLANNING CENTER 8g - 2013
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2020
PLANNING CENTER, THE 8 - 2007
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2020
PLANNING CENTER, THE 8A - 2008
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2020
PLANNING CENTER, THE 8B - 2008
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2020
PLANNING CENTER, THE 8C - 2008
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2020
PLANNING CENTER, THE 8D - 2008
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2020
PLANNING CENTER, THE 8E - 2012
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 4, 2013 <br />Page 2 <br />Environmental <br />TASK 1. ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES <br />No change; this task is complete. <br />TASK 2. DATA COLLECTION <br />Data Collection was completed for the initial phase of the environmental document. Extras below are requested <br />to address data collection associated with project revisions. <br />Work Completed Out of Scope <br />■ This task includes several revisions to property take tables, verification and coordination between exhibits and <br />tables. Collecting additional data during multiple project revisions. <br />— Additional budget: $4,680 <br />TASK 3. INITIAL STUDY <br />Work Completed Out of Scope <br />■ Prior to submittal of the screencheck Initial Study revisions were made to respond to changes in the project. <br />After submittal of the first screencheck document (8/16/12), four more unanticipated rounds of document <br />review /revisions were conducted (submittals 9/18, 9/24, 9/26 and 9/28 (final version). The majority of the <br />revisions responded to City request for significantly greater detail and to ongoing changes to the alignment <br />and property take. The extras for this task include numerous revisions to both text and figures. <br />— Additional budget: $10,340 <br />TASK 4. NOP <br />Work Completed Out of Scope <br />■ The NOP was translated from English to Spanish <br />— Additional budget: $350 <br />TASK S. ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EIR <br />The Administrative Draft EIR is in progress. Based on the following assumptions, there are no changes to the <br />budget for this task: <br />• The initial submittal of Administrative Draft EIR will include all sections except the Executive Summary and <br />Project Alternatives. Upon consultation with City staff and concurrence on the project alternatives, the <br />remaining sections will be completed and submitted. <br />• The alternatives analysis will include the 'No Project' alternative and up to three additional alternatives selected <br />on CEQA criteria (ability to attain most of the project objectives and reduce or eliminate one or more <br />significant impacts). The alternatives may be design alternatives or potentially construction- related (phasing, <br />equipment, etc.) alternatives. <br />• The EIR will include a background discussion of the alternatives prepared and presented to the public during <br />the design process. Unless one of these alternatives has the potential to reduce or eliminate a significant <br />environmental impact associated with the preferred alignment, it is not anticipated that these alternatives will <br />be reviewed in detail. No technical analysis (e.g., air quality, greenhouse gases, noise, traffic, etc., is anticipated <br />for the alternate alignments presented to the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.