My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
COMMUNITY REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY(1974-2012)
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03/15/04
>
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2013 8:27:01 AM
Creation date
11/5/2013 8:26:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
magnitude of 6.3. The project area could potentially be subject <br />to moderate to severe ground shaking in the event of a major <br />earthquake occurs along the Newport - Inglewood Fault or one of <br />the nearby faults in the southern California region. However, <br />the seismic risk at the SD -60 project area is not considered <br />significantly different from other areas in the region. The <br />proposed amendment to SD -60 would incorporate existing land uses <br />and buildings into the SD -60 project area and would not increase <br />the risk the potential for seismic impacts, beyond the current <br />level of risk. <br />(A -3) Seismic - related ground failure, including <br />liquefaction? <br />No Impact <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the <br />proposed SD -60 project area is considered to have High -to -Very <br />High potential for liquefaction impacts. The proposed amendment <br />to SD -60 would incorporate existing land uses and buildings into <br />the SD -60 project area and would not increase the risk for <br />potential liquefaction impacts, beyond the current level of <br />risk. <br />B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the <br />loss of topsoil? <br />No Impact <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD -60 would not increase <br />the potential for soil erosion or sedimentation impacts, in that <br />the proposed amendment would not involve any construction <br />activities that would uncover soils. <br />C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique geological <br />feature? <br />No Impact <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there <br />are no unique geologic features within the SD -60 project area. <br />Therefore, approval of the proposed amendment to SD -60 would not <br />result in the loss of any unique geologic features. <br />D. In the project located on strata or soil that is unstable <br />or that would become unstable as a result of the project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.