My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
COMMUNITY REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY(1974-2012)
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03/15/04
>
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2013 8:27:01 AM
Creation date
11/5/2013 8:26:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The proposed amendment to SD -60 would incorporate existing land <br />uses buildings into the SD -60 project area, which are consistent <br />with the City's General Plan. Approval of the proposed amendment <br />to SD -60 would not induce substantial growth in the City, beyond <br />what is projected in the General Plan. Additionally, the SD -60 <br />project area is void of residential land uses. Therefore, <br />approval and implementation of the proposed amendment to SD -60 <br />would not displace existing residential uses or population. <br />XI. PUBLIC SERVICES <br />Fire Protection, Police Protection, Schools, Parks, Other Public <br />Facilities <br />No Impact <br />The proposed amendment to SD -60 would incorporate existing land <br />uses and buildings into the SD -60 project area. Approval of the <br />proposed amendment to SD -60 would not involve any land use <br />changes or changes in development intensities that would <br />generate additional demands for public services over current <br />levels of demand within project area. <br />XII. RECREATION <br />A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood <br />and regional parks or other recreational facilities such <br />that substantial physical deterioration of the facility <br />would occur or be accelerated? <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require <br />the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, <br />which might have an adverse physical effect on the <br />environment. <br />No Impact <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD -60 would not directly - <br />increase the demand for recreational facilities, in that the <br />proposed project does not involve any land use changes or <br />activities that would increase the demands for recreational <br />facilities. <br />XIII. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC <br />A. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br />street system? <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.