My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
COMMUNITY REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY(1974-2012)
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03/15/04
>
031504 Aquisition Leashold Agmt Vinci Invest 2051-2101 E Edinger
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2013 8:27:01 AM
Creation date
11/5/2013 8:26:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of <br />service standard established by the county congestion <br />management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature <br />E. Result in inadequate emergency access <br />F. Result in inadequate parking capacity <br />G. Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative <br />transportation <br />No Impact <br />The proposed project would incorporate existing land uses into <br />the SD -60 project area. Approval of the proposed project would <br />not involve any land use change or changes in land use <br />intensities that would generate additional traffic. Therefore, <br />approval of the proposed amendment to SD -60 would not have a <br />direct impact on traffic volumes, roadway configurations, <br />emergency access or level of services established in the County <br />of Orange Congestion Management Plan or alternative modes of <br />transportation within the project area. <br />C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including <br />either an increase in traffic levels or a change in <br />location that results in substantial safety risks? <br />No Impact <br />Approval proposed amendment to SD -60 would not have any adverse <br />impacts on air traffic patterns, in that the existing buildings <br />incorporated into the SD -60 project area are no more than 2- <br />stories in height and would not interfere with air traffic <br />patterns. <br />F. Result in inadequate parking capacity <br />No Impact <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD -60 would not result in <br />impacts to parking facilities in that the proposed project does <br />not involve any land use changes or changes in development <br />intensities that would increase existing parking demands. <br />XIV. UTILITIES /SERVICE SYSTEMS <br />A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board? <br />21 <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.