Laserfiche WebLink
0 Level of integration between applications and demonstrated interfaces with external <br />systems /devices. <br />• Capability, design, reliability, warranty and expandability of proposed hardware <br />• Economic feasibility and justification of all costs. <br />• Vendor willingness and ability to negotiate a contract acceptable to the City. <br />Feasibility, timeliness and duality of software implementation schedule and conversion <br />Plans (if data conversion is required). <br />• Level of assistance to be provided to the City by the vendor during the implementation <br />process as part of the contract. <br />• The number of hours and extent of user training. <br />0 duality and extent of the documentation to be provided. <br />Additionally, information pertaining to each major area of the specincadons would be summarized, <br />evaluated and ranked. 'rho sample illustration, below, Is one of approximately 100 such charts <br />produced by our proprietary RFP scoring tool, Ch Cam provides all clients with these illustrations <br />to provide graphic displays of vendor responses in each proposed module; enabling a visible <br />presentation of vendor contrasts: <br />. .. 0.MIS Gah,W rtpY.4x,wMY llaa, NoauWbj <br />Information pertaining to each major area of the specifications would be summarized, evaluated and <br />ranked. Additional information and clarification would be obtained from responding vendors as <br />required. Finally, the list of vendors would be narrowed to two semi - finalist vendors who would be <br />further evaluated though vendor demonstrations, operational site visits, reference checks and oral g. <br />interviews. Based upon the proposal and subsequent analysis, Cit Cam would recommend the 0 <br />company whose system(s) and equipment best meet the overall requirements of the City in a Finalist <br />Recommendation Report, The Finalist Recommendation Report would be submitted both in <br />0 <br />U <br />Y „JfrS <br />25B -19 <br />