My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AZTECA LANDSCAPE-2015
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
A
>
AZTECA LANDSCAPE-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 8:16:04 AM
Creation date
1/28/2014 1:04:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
AZTECA LANDSCAPE
Contract #
A-2013-109
Agency
PARKS, RECREATION, & COMMUNITY SERVICES
Council Approval Date
7/15/2013
Insurance Exp Date
9/14/2014
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. EXHIBIT C — PROPOSERS CERTIFICATION AND COST PROPOSAL <br />C. EXHIBIT D — REFERENCES — The Proposer submitted a list of agencies, past and present, <br />for which you have provided work similar to the scope identified in this RFP (Exhibit A) within <br />the last 5 years. <br />D. EXHIBIT E - PROPOSERS STATEMENT <br />E. EXHIBIT F — CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCRIMINATION BY CONTRACTOR <br />EXHIBIT G — RESPONSIBLE PROPOSER — SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE <br />G. EXHIBIT H — NONCOLLUSION AFFIDAVIT <br />The proposal must have been completely responsive to the RFP. Any deviations to the <br />requirements of this RFP must have been included in the proposal. Such exceptions must <br />have been included as a separate element of the proposal entitled "Exceptions and <br />Deviations." The Executive Director, in his sole and absolute discretion, may authorize or <br />deny any exceptions. <br />The City reserved the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation was <br />made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to the RFP or otherwise. The City <br />reserved the right to waive minor inconsistencies in submitted proposals. <br />XIX. CONTRACTOR SELECTION — PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION <br />The criteria for evaluating the proposals submitted took the following items into consideration: <br />The response to this Request for Proposals should have contained documentation of contractor's <br />credentials and expertise in this field. Consideration was given to contractors with demonstrable <br />and documented experience in similar work. An evaluation reviewed the responses received and <br />interviewed the companies who submitted the most responsive proposals. The following evaluation <br />criteria and weights were used to evaluate the bids: <br />Capability and Experience of Contractor (25 %) <br />1. Ability of contractor and his /her ball diamond infield maintenance sub - contractor to obtain <br />the staff and equipment necessary to perform specifications as outlined in the contractor's <br />business plan <br />2. Qualifications of certified irrigation techs assigned to this job, and number of FTE's <br />assigned. Required documentation must be submitted with proposal. <br />3. Training and safety precautions taken to perform specifications <br />4. Experience of supervisory and management staff assigned to the contract <br />5. The value of any new product or service suggestions or other new ideas or enhancements <br />6. List of equipment by manufacturer's name, model number, hours in service and attachments <br />to be used during the agreement period. <br />Past Performances (25 %) <br />1. Past record of performance on contracts of similar size and scope with Santa Ana or other <br />governmental agencies including such factors as reliability, adherence to specifications and <br />compliance with contract terms and conditions <br />2. Past record of performance on requests for extra work, including ability to accurately bid <br />jobs, cost competitiveness, and quality of work <br />District 4 Park I anrisrana .4'narifiratinn <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.