My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2014-02-18
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
02/18/2014
>
FULL PACKET_2014-02-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2014 7:53:58 AM
Creation date
2/18/2014 8:23:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
2/18/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
XIX. <br />The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no <br />representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this <br />RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to waive minor inconsistencies in <br />submitted proposals. <br />CONTRACTOR SELECTION — PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION <br />The criteria for evaluating the proposals submitted will take the following items into <br />consideration: <br />The response to this Request for Proposals should contain documentation of contractor's <br />credentials and expertise in this field. Consideration will be given to contractors with <br />demonstrable and documented experience in similar work An evaluation committee will <br />review the responses received and interview the companies who submit the most <br />responsive proposals. The following evaluation criteria and weights will be used to <br />evaluate the bids: <br />Capability and Experience of Contractor (25 %) <br />1. Ability of contractor and his /her ball diamond infield maintenance sub - contractor to <br />obtain the staff and equipment necessary to perform specifications as outlined in <br />the contractor's business plan <br />2. Qualifications of certified irrigation techs assigned to this job, and number of FTE's <br />assigned. Required documentation must be submitted with proposal. <br />3. Training and safety precautions taken to perform specifications <br />4. Experience of supervisory and management staff assigned to the contract <br />5. The value of any new product or service suggestions or other new ideas or <br />enhancements <br />6. List of equipment by manufacturer's name, model number, hours in service and <br />attachments to be used during the agreement period. <br />Past Performances (25 %) <br />1. Past record of performance on contracts of similar size and scope with Santa Ana <br />or other governmental agencies including such factors as reliability, adherence to <br />specifications and compliance with contract terms and conditions <br />2. Past record of performance on requests for extra work, including ability to <br />accurately bid jobs, cost competitiveness, and quality of work <br />3. Acceptable, verifiable references and site reviews <br />Cost of Proposal (50 %) <br />1. Cost of base proposal <br />2. Cost of specialized services <br />Based upon the foregoing criteria, all proposals shall be ranked by score. Only those <br />proposals receiving a score above 70 will be considered for award. The City reserves the <br />right to award the contract to any proposer with a score above 70. <br />FOLLOW -UP OF EVALUATION PROCESS BY CONTRACTOR <br />Contractors may follow up on the evaluation of the proposals by contacting Frank <br />Hernandez, via email at fhernandez @ santa - ana.org. <br />Park Janitorial Maintenance Services RFP 14 -002 <br />Page 9 <br />19C -11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.