My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCC NETWORK SOLUTIONS, A PACIFIC COAST CABLING, INC. CO. 5 -2013
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
P
>
PCC NETWORK SOLUTIONS, A PACIFIC COAST CABLING, INC. CO. 5 -2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2016 5:10:33 PM
Creation date
2/24/2014 9:50:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
PCC NETWORK SOLUTIONS, A PACIFIC COAST CABLING, INC. CO.
Contract #
A-2013-144
Agency
FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Council Approval Date
9/3/2013
Expiration Date
8/31/2016
Insurance Exp Date
1/1/2017
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.1 REVIEW OF REQUESTED SUBMISSION ITEMS <br />Proposals will be reviewed for completeness. Proposals with missing items may not be <br />considered. Proposer's submission: <br />6.1.1. Must contain a completed "Proposal Response Form" (Appendix A) or a separate <br />submission with a response to each item included in the "Proposal Response <br />Form." <br />6.1.2. Should include (where applicable) Proof of authority to bind the corporation as <br />defined in section 4.4. <br />6.1.3. Include the required proposal with all submission requirements as defined in <br />section 5. <br />6.1.4. Must have been delivered to the correct place prior to the specified closing date <br />and time (section 5). <br />6.2 EVALUATION <br />Selection shall be based upon a competitive selection process and not limited to price alone. <br />Proposers must satisfy the City of their ability to perform the services required. In the judgment <br />of the City, any proposal that does not provide adequate evidence that the Proposer has the <br />capabilities to perform the services sought by the City (see Section 1.4) or does not show that it <br />meets the minimum Vendor qualifications (see Section 2.1) will not be further considered. <br />It is not the City's intention to exclude very high bids or to automatically award an agreement to <br />the Proposer of the lowest price for services. The City seeks to get the best balance of service <br />value and price. <br />Based on the information provided in their RFP response, each of the Proposers will be <br />evaluated by a City selection team and will be assigned a point score for each of five evaluation <br />criteria. While evaluation is subjective by its nature, the City selection team will judge each <br />proposal on its merit in only the evaluation criteria areas. The weighted evaluation criteria <br />include: <br />Criteria <br />Max Points <br />Qualifications that exceed the minimum <br />20 <br />References [key focus: client experience with <br />similar service level complexity] <br />20 <br />Ability to provide service required <br />20 <br />Quality Control Methods and Practices <br />20 <br />Cost <br />20 <br />Total <br />100 <br />6.3 INTERVIEW <br />An interview may be required for clarification purposes if so determined by the evaluation team. <br />However, only top rated Proposers will be asked to participate in the interview process. <br />Page 12 of 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.