Laserfiche WebLink
Final EIR No. 2011 -01, VA No. 2012 -04 & VTTM No. 2012 -02 <br />February 10, 2014 <br />Page 9 <br />The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding properties as <br />the residence and garage are proposed to be used as it was historically, with little or no <br />changes to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The project has <br />been designed in compliance with all other applicable development standards for an R -1 <br />project. <br />Finally, the project will not adversely affect the General Plan. The proposed use will result in <br />the improvement of the property into a single- family residence that will be consistent with the <br />Secretary of Interior standards. Further, the variance is consistent with goals and policies of <br />the General Plan, including Land Use Element Goal 4 to protect and enhance development <br />sites which are unique community assets, Land Use Element Policy 4.2 to encourage the <br />retention and reuse of historical buildings and sites, and Housing Element Policy HE -1.7 to <br />support preservation and enhancement of residential structures and properties that are <br />considered local historic or cultural resources. <br />Variance from Lot Frontage Standard <br />The applicant is also requesting a variance from Section 41- 237(b) of the Santa Ana Municipal <br />Code (SAMC), which requires lots in the Single - Family Residence (R -1) zoning district to have at <br />least 50 feet of street frontage, as measured from the back of the setback. The applicant's <br />proposal is to have one new lot in the development (Lot No. 12) have 41 feet of lot frontage, which <br />is less than the minimum 50 feet of lot frontage. During the review of the street design for the <br />project, staff determined that the City did not have a "knuckle" standard for curvilinear streets, with <br />the original design insufficient to adequately accommodate turning movements for trash trucks and <br />similar sized vehicles. To address this concern, staff used the County's standard for curvilinear <br />streets, which uses a larger "knuckle" design at street curves. The application of the County's <br />standard impacted the width of the lot fronting the "knuckle." Due to the application of this <br />standard, Lot No. 12 cannot meet the 50 -foot street frontage standard, The lot will be in <br />compliance with all other applicable development standards in the R -1 zone, including lot size and <br />setbacks. <br />In analyzing the variance requests, staff must be able to show that findings can be made that support <br />the criteria listed above. <br />The project site has a special circumstance related to its size, shape and location. The subject <br />site is a five -acre rectangular shaped parcel that will be constrained by the application of a <br />County street standard to the project. In order to provide a larger street area for trash trucks and <br />similar sized vehicles to maneuver, the County's standard for the design of "knuckles" was <br />imposed on this project. The County standard required the taking of more land than proposed, <br />which impacted the applicant's ability to meet the minimum lot width standard for an R -1 project. <br />Therefore, applying the strict letter of the Code would, in this particular case, deprive the <br />75A -13 <br />