Laserfiche WebLink
bgVqted nohi a fea vetheProlecCwithouttheHoadp4'- <br />na'(ed,whhen ii board�ofa of t a t feature IV <br />appeals of the Planning Commission's decision <br />(c) Analysis <br />f "An accurate Project description isnecessar <br />or an lntellikent.,,evaluation of the poomth <br />Nit.onineiand'effects of a nrnnnoa.t <br />mra1i and an <br />can 'rNeieArt If, ....Ln_ <br />=„,umg was ] <br />are an :there" in the EIIL <br />94t,h at:p, "2,1111format <br />bUe and decision mailer <br />no Indication nt'tlid reel <br />Y other interesi'ad par <br />i nature of fleodnlaln hb <br />its.role as <br />aspect to I <br />the <br />uie project," (3) 7lieFrag..; <br />Be It discussed <br />Main benching (a). Record. : <br />et alternative, <br />was an open Protectedepeciasot' . <br />In the Prate Project anhnalspotendal(yi <br />nadan. about Status s esr �erelistedonatableof <br />Old'shara,do the Poolmial for occurrenceatttthesiittleBe :: <br />te e: and o uro nlikl' "l <br />1-, fora u w.pol <br />,eiasomte ar <br />Wed about <br />or whether <br />the Project. <br />g IM the <br />leterized as <br />to , "° 41G <br />Thera i en weigh <br />cmml <br />elevat <br />parch, <br />IMeProjectdescrptioa <br />hattheProjectchan <br />Poteni <br />to be <br />es <br />,een"'Onmentaleff ct" <br />precl t <br />a of the EI2.. (Inure! <br />2d� at p, .1129, italics <br />and R u <br />Masonite asserts that <br />mitigat <br />r,. a <br />oo species wide a "medium" <br />for occurrence, and provided <br />"a designed, to reduce those <br />:ance, <br />$tile status species inch od' , <br />stated that tiia Frog <br />1 strewn Habitats W th lock, . <br />isually Below G,0(i0 feet in <br />inhequentwhommh'oducod f <br />table estimated the <br />curren0ein the Projeotarea <br />a. Ackerman Groek may <br />el (slow /low slowportions). <br />ant{n both Ackerman Creek :� <br />Thus, the Draft specified no <br />or die Frog <br />the DraC,Fish & Game said <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />