Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17" Street <br />b.) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? <br />Refer to response 3.15 (a.), above. The proposed Project does not include, nor would it require, <br />construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse physical impact on the <br />environment would occur from such facilities as a result of the proposed Project. No mitigation measures <br />are required. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.16 Transportation /Traffic <br />This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, <br />Subsections U - Impacts to Transportation Facilities, and V - Construction Impacts of the 1990 FEIS /EIR. <br />As stated in Section 1.0, the proposed Project eliminates the dedicated eastbound right -turn lane and <br />proposes a shared right -turn lane in its place at the intersection of Bristol Street and 17"' Street. <br />a.) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for <br />the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation <br />including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation <br />system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and <br />bicycle paths, and mass transit. <br />The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable plans, ordinances and policies establishing <br />measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system as described in the 1990 <br />FEIS/EIR. The widening of Bristol Street was designated in the Orange County Master Plan, and was <br />recommended in the Bristol Street Corridor Study — Final Report prepared by Mohle, Grover & <br />Associates (1983). It was also recommended in the Arterial Highway Element — Santa Ana Element — <br />Santa Ana Transportation Corridor State II Alternative Analysis prepared by Parsons, Brinckerhoff, <br />Quade and Douglas, Inc. (1983). The proposed widening is also consistent with the recommendation <br />found in the Intercity Liaison Committee — Five -Year Transportation Study Update to 1990 prepared by <br />Basmaciyan- Darnell, Inc. (1985). Furthermore, the proposed Project would improve traffic operations <br />through the Project corridor. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />b.) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level <br />of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county <br />congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />ANA 111 -334 (PER -02 -01) CITY OF SANTA ANA (11/25/2013 REV2) 132897 CM PAGE 48 <br />55C -63 <br />