My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25C - AGMT - ON-CALL SRVS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
06/03/2014
>
25C - AGMT - ON-CALL SRVS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2014 5:30:08 PM
Creation date
5/29/2014 5:25:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25C
Date
6/3/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agreement Exhibit A <br />City of Santa Ana, PWA <br />RFP — ON -CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR WATER AND SEWER MAIN <br />IMPROVEMENTS <br />• EXHIBIT D — REFERENCES — The Proposer shall submit at least three (3) <br />agencies, past and present, for which you have provided work similar to that <br />identified in this RFP (Exhibit A) during the last 10 years. Include the name of the <br />agency, address, contact name, a -mail, telephone number and a description of the <br />work performed for the reference. <br />• EXHIBIT E - PROPOSERS STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING <br />• EXHIBIT F — CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCRIMINATION BY CONTRACTOR <br />• EXHIBIT G— NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT <br />The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Any exceptions to the <br />requirements of this RFP must be included in the proposal. Such exceptions must <br />be included as a separate element of the proposal entitled "Exceptions and <br />Deviations." The Executive Director, in his sole and absolute discretion, may <br />authorize or deny any exceptions, <br />• The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no <br />representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this <br />RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to waive minor inconsistencies in <br />submitted Proposals. <br />XVIL CONTRACTORICONSULTANT SELECTION- PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION <br />The criteria for evaluating the proposals submitted will take the following items into <br />consideration: qualifications, abilities, deliverables, approach, references, and responsiveness <br />to the RFP. <br />The proposals will be reviewed by a committee of City staff. The committee will evaluate the <br />proposers based on the written response to the RFP and the City evaluation criteria. The <br />committee will rank the proposers and select the top six (or top tier based on the internal <br />ranking process) for an interview by calculating a final interim score for each written proposal. <br />Technical proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria: <br />11[17 <br />25C -69 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.