Laserfiche WebLink
VA Nos. 2013 -06, 2013 -07 and 2014 -02 <br />June 23, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />• That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding property.. <br />• That the granting of the variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. <br />If these findings can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the variances. Conversely, the inability to <br />make any of these findings would result in a denial. Using this information, staff has prepared the <br />following analysis, which forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. <br />Variance Nos. 2013 -06 and 2013 -07 — Lot Size and Street Frontage <br />Section 41- 247,6(a) and Section 41- 247.7(b) require a minimum 6,000 square foot lot and a <br />minimum of 50 feet of street frontage respectively. The lot was legally subdivided in 1925 which <br />was prior to the establishment of minimum standards for a lot, and the size and width configuration is <br />therefore legal nonconforming and is consistent with other lots in the neighborhood. Staff <br />recommends approval of the variances for reductions in minimum lot size and street frontage based <br />on the following facts and findings: <br />The project site has special circumstances related to its size, shape and surroundings. The lot <br />was created in 1925 prior to the establishment of development standards for lots in the City. The <br />lot was legally subdivided; and is therefore legally nonconforming, and is consistent with other <br />lots in the neighborhood. The lots on either side of the subject site are developed at this time so <br />there is no potential for this lot to become larger. <br />The granting of these variances are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial <br />property rights. Without the approval of the requested variances the developable area would be <br />so restricted as to become infeasible for development and would remain vacant. The proposed <br />project maximizes the developable area while minimizing any impacts to any adjacent single - <br />family residences. The lot was legally subdivided in 1925 to a size and width configuration that is <br />legal nonconforming and is consistent with other lots in the neighborhood. <br />The granting of these variances will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding properties. <br />The project has been designed to meet the applicable development standards for the front yard <br />setback to minimize the visual impact on the street. Given these property restrictions, the <br />proposed residence is consistent in size with other homes in the neighborhood. <br />Finally, the granting of these variances will not adversely affect the General Plan. The project has <br />been designed to be architecturally integrated with other single- family homes in the area and is <br />consistent with the Land Use Element's Policies 2.10 and 3.5 that supports new development <br />which is harmonious in scale and character with existing development in the area. The <br />development of a single - family residence on this previously vacant parcel also supports Policy 13 <br />of the Housing Element, which promotes a complementary mix of land uses that improves the <br />character and stability of neighborhoods. <br />32A -5 <br />