Laserfiche WebLink
VA Nos. 2013 -06, 2013 -07 and 2014 -02 <br />June 23, 2014 <br />Page 4 <br />Variance No. 2014 -02 — Off- Street Parking <br />The applicant is proposing to provide a two -car garage with access from an existing alley. Section <br />41- 1420(a)(1) requires four parking stalls for a single - family residence, with two stalls within a <br />garage and two stalls in the driveway. Without a driveway, the proposal does not meet the <br />minimum standard of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Section 41- 1303(a) requires the minimum <br />length of a parking stall be 18 feet. The size of the rear yard would be further reduced if the proposal <br />added an additional 15 feet to the driveway size. Since private open space is related to overall <br />livability, a reduction in parking requirements is a legitimate concession rather than losing additional <br />open space. Providing a driveway would result in a loss of open space and the majority of the rear <br />yard paved with concrete. Staff recommends approval of the variance for a reduction in required <br />off- street parking based on the following facts and findings: <br />The project site has special circumstances related to its size, shape and surroundings, The <br />smaller lot size significantly limits the project's ability to meet all development requirements and <br />provide adequate parking and open space area. An analysis of development options concluded <br />that a project meeting all the development standards in the R2 zone would restrict development <br />on the parcel to a residence that is not viable. <br />The granting of this variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial <br />property rights. Without the approval of the requested variance the developable area of the site <br />would be so restricted as to become infeasible for development and the site would remain vacant. <br />The proposed project allows development on a substandard parcel while minimizing any impacts <br />to any adjacent single- family residences. The size of the rear yard would be reduced if the <br />driveway complied with code. Since private open space is related to overall livability, a reduction <br />in parking is a legitimate concession rather than losing additional open space. The lot was legally <br />subdivided in 1925 and is legal nonconforming as to lot size as are many of the lots in this <br />neighborhood. <br />The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding properties. The <br />project has been designed to meet the applicable development standards for setbacks to minimize <br />the visual impact on the street. Additionally, the garage is positioned nearest the eastern property <br />line to maintain the required 20 -foot front yard setback and maximize open space between the <br />detached garage and house. Several residences on Jackson Street were constructed in a similar <br />configuration without a major impact to the neighborhood. <br />Lastly; the granting of this variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. The project has <br />been designed to be architecturally integrated with other single - family homes in the area and is <br />consistent with Policies 2.10 and 3.5 of the Land Use Element that supports new development <br />which is harmonious in scale and character with existing development in the area. The <br />development of a single - family residence on this previously vacant parcel also supports Policy 1.3 <br />of the Housing Element that promotes a complementary mix of land uses that improves the <br />character and stability of neighborhoods. <br />32A -6 <br />