My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55C - RESO - FIXED GUIDEWAY PROJECT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
08/05/2014
>
55C - RESO - FIXED GUIDEWAY PROJECT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/4/2014 8:54:04 AM
Creation date
8/4/2014 8:51:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
55C
Date
8/5/2014
Destruction Year
2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Both sites were evaluated based on Community Support for their conversion to use as an <br />O &M Facility, Right -of -Way Required, Environmental Tradeoffs, Noise and Vibration, Ease <br />of Transit Operations and Capital Cost. <br />Site A is slightly smaller than Site B and irregularly shaped, making the ease of operations <br />somewhat less than with Site B. Site A is also more expensive than Site B. Site A offers <br />some advantages in terms of environmental tradeoffs. It would not result in the <br />displacement of any residents. It also would not create additional noise compared to <br />existing conditions and may in fact reduce noise somewhat. It was anticipated that the <br />environmental review process and accompanying public comment would further discern <br />the relative advantages and disadvantages of each of these options and support the <br />selection of the preferred option. Through this process, Site B was identified as offering <br />better options for future system expansion into Garden Grove because of its location in the <br />western portion of the alignment and its size compared to Site A. <br />2.4.2 4t' Street Parking Scenarios <br />The Streetcar 1 alignment would utilize 4`h Street between Ross Street and Mortimer <br />Street in the westbound direction. From east of Ross Street to French Street, 4'" Street has <br />one travel lane in each direction with head -in diagonal parking along each side of the <br />roadway. The diagonal parking, with vehicles exiting parking spaces by backing into the <br />travel lane, is incompatible with reliable streetcar operations. Three design options were <br />identified to address the diagonal parking on 4'h Street, shown previously on Figure 2 -7 and <br />described below: <br />• Scenario A: Convert the diagonal parking along the south side of 4`h Street to <br />parallel parking and widen the sidewalk along the south side from 12 feet to 20 <br />feet. <br />• Scenario B: Remove the diagonal parking along the south side of 4`h Street and <br />widen the sidewalk along the south side from 12 feet to 28 feet. <br />• Scenario C: Remove the diagonal parking along both sides of 4 " Street and widen <br />the sidewalks along both sides from 12 feet to 28 feet. In this option, only the <br />parking removal and sidewalk widening along the south side would be included in <br />the cost of the project since the streetcar will only operate on the south side <br />(eastbound direction) of the street. The City of Santa Ana would pursue alternative <br />funding to construct the improvements to the north side. <br />The three scenarios to address the diagonal parking along 4"' Street were evaluated based <br />on Community Support for the scenario, Environmental Tradeoffs, impacts to <br />Traffic /Circulation, Parking, and Bicycle /Pedestrian Facilities, Construction Impacts <br />(temporary), Ease of Transit Operations and Capital Cost. <br />LPA Decision Report <br />July 2014 <br />55C -44 <br />2.14 1 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.