55C - RESO - FIXED GUIDEWAY PROJECT

Home Browse Search

The sidewalks along the south side of the street will be widened from their existing 1 2 -foot width to approximately 20 feet wide. This will enhance the pedestrian experience and provide greater flexibility for event - related activities and Downtown businesses to utilize this space. An EA /DEIR was prepared for the project to meet the requirements of NEPA and CEQA. The alternatives identified for evaluation in the EA /DEIR were based on public comments as well as technical analyses, as detailed in the AA Report. Table 3 -1, presented previously, summarizes the potential adverse effects associated with the implementation of Streetcar Alternatives 1 and 2. No impacts would occur from the implementation of the TSM Alternative. The EA /DEIR identified that Streetcar Alternatives 1 and 2 would result in adverse effects associated with hazardous materials, operational noise (moderate), safety, and construction air quality are anticipated to occur prior to incorporation of mitigation measures (CEQA only). Mitigation measures would eliminate the adverse effects associated with hazardous materials and safety. Moderate effects associated with operational noise would remain after the implementation of mitigation, however these effects would not be considered adverse. In addition, the EA /DEIR identified that significant construction air quality impacts under CEQA would remain after the implementation of mitigation; however, it construction - related air quality impacts would be temporary and not adverse under NEPA after the implementation of mitigation. No adverse effects were identified for the TSM Alternative. Following the completion of the AA and EA /DEIR, there was a 45 -day public review period for the EA /DEIR conducted between May 23, 2014 and July 7, 2014. During this time, the public was notified and encouraged to review and provide comments on the EA /DEIR in compliance with NEPA and CEQA requirements; the AA was also made available. The following summarizes the comments received during the Public Review Period that are germane to the selection of the Locally Preferred Alternative. General community support for a streetcar system: While there were differences of opinion regarding the route, there was general support for the concept of a streetcar system connecting SARTC with the City of Garden Grove, through the Downtown and Civic Center area. Concern about the duration and potential impacts of construction on local Downtown businesses: There were several comments from local business owners inquiring about the LPA Decision Report July 2014 55C -76 5.51 Page