TETRA TECH, INC. 6 - 2014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A City of Santa Ana, PWA I Agreement Exhibit RFP - ON -CALL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR WATER AND SEWER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS • EXHIBIT D - REFERENCES - The Proposer shall submit at least three (3) agencies, past and present, for which you have provided work similar to that identified in this RFP (Exhibit A) during the last 10 years. Include the name of the agency, address, contact name, e-mail, telephone number and a description of the work performed for the reference. • EXHIBIT E - PROPOSERS STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING • EXHIBIT F - CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCRIMINATION BY CONTRACTOR • EXHIBIT G- NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT Key Guide rating of "A +" or better: with a Financial Size Category of "XII" or higher. All Insurers must have an agent for service of process in California. • The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Any exceptions to the requirements of this RFP must be included in the proposal. Such exceptions must be included as a separate element of the proposal entitled "Exceptions and Deviations." The Executive Director, in his sole and absolute discretion, may authorize or deny any exceptions. • The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to waive minor inconsistencies in submitted Proposals. XVIL CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT SELECTION- PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION The criteria for evaluating the proposals submitted will take the following items into consideration: qualifications, abilities, deliverables, approach, references, and responsiveness to the RFP. The proposals will be reviewed by a committee of City staff. The committee will evaluate the proposers based on the written response to the RFP and the City evaluation criteria. The committee will rank the proposers and select the top six (or top tier based on the internal ranking process) for an interview by calculating a final interim score for each written proposal. Technical proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria: 10