Laserfiche WebLink
XIX. CONTRACTOR sELECTION —PROPOSAL AND EVALUATION <br />The criteria for evaluating the proposals submitted will take the following items into consideration: <br />The response to this Request for Proposals should contain documentation of contractor's <br />credentials and expertise in this field. Consideration will be given to contractors with demonstrable <br />and documented experience in similar work. An evaluation committee will review the responses <br />received and interview the companies who submit the most responsive proposals. The following <br />evaluation criteria and weights will be used to evaluate the bids: <br />A. Capability and Experience of Contractor (25 %) <br />1. Ability of contractor and his/her sub - contractors to obtain the staff, equipment and <br />commodities necessary to perform specifications as outlined in the contractor's <br />business plan. <br />2. Qualifications of certified irrigation techs assigned to this job, and number of FTE's <br />assigned. Required documentation must be submitted with proposal. <br />3. Thoroughness of the Proposers implementation plan, business plan, injury and <br />illness prevention plan and MUTCD proposed traffic closure plans. <br />4. Training programs taken to perform to the quality levels in the specifications. <br />5. Experience of supervisory and management staff assigned to the contract. <br />6. The value of any new product or service suggestions or other new Ideas or <br />enhancements <br />List of equipment by manufacturer's name, model number, hours in service and <br />attachments to be used during the agreement period. <br />B. Past Performances (25 %) <br />1. Past record of performance on contracts of similar size and scope with Santa Ana or <br />other governmental agencies including such factors as reliability, adherence to <br />specifications and compliance with contract terms and conditions. <br />2. Past record of performance on requests for extra work, including ability to accurately <br />bid jobs, cost competitiveness, and quality of work, <br />3. Acceptable, verifiable references and site reviews. <br />C. Cost of Proposal (50 %) <br />Cost of base proposal <br />Cost of specialized services <br />Based upon the foregoing criteria, all proposals shall be ranked by score. Only those proposals <br />receiving a score above 70 will be considered for award. The City reserves the right to award the <br />contract to any proposer with a score above 70. <br />FOLLOW -UP OF EVALUATION PROCESS BY CONTRACTOR <br />Contractors may follow up on the evaluation of the proposals by contacting Frank Arroyo via email <br />at farrayo @ santa- ana.org. <br />The proposals will be reviewed by a committee of City team members. The committee will evaluate <br />proposers based on the response to the RFP and the City evaluation criteria set forth above. A <br />final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank the proposers. The <br />committee may interview the top tier of proposers and recommend award of the contract to the <br />proposer who will provide the best quality service at minimum cost to the City. The City reserves <br />Districts 1, 4 and 5 Park Landscape RFP <br />19'111 <br />