My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-060 - Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2014
>
2014-060 - Adopting Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2014 2:21:56 PM
Creation date
10/3/2014 1:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2014-060
Date
9/16/2014
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard <br />Residential Development Project <br />CEQA Findings <br />impacts or lead to substantial physical deterioration of park facilities. Therefore, this <br />impact is less than significant. (EIR, p. 5 -63, 5 -64; January 2014 EIR Attachment, p, 8.) <br />2. Impact: Would the project require construction or expansion of recreational facilities <br />which may have an adverse physical effect on the environment? <br />Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp, 5 -63, 5 -64; January 2014 EIR Attachment, p. <br />8.) <br />Analysis: The project would result in an increased demand for recreation services and <br />facilities, specifically in Portola Park, adjacent to the project site. However, the increase <br />in demand resulting from 22 new residences is not anticipated to result in the need to <br />construct new facilities. Therefore, this impact is less than significant. (EIR, p. 5 -63, 5- <br />64; January 2014 EIR Attachment, p. 8.) <br />M. TRAFFIC <br />I. Impact: Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature? <br />Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -98; January 2014 EIR Attachment, pp, 8 -9.) <br />Analysis: The project does not propose any design features that would pose a hazards to <br />traffic. As a result, this impact is considered less than significant. (EIR, p. 5 -96, 5 -97.) <br />N. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS <br />1. Impact: Would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board? <br />Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -99 through 5 -101; January 2014 EIR <br />Attachment, p. 9.) <br />Analysis: Orange County Sanitation District ( "OCSD ") is the service agency providing <br />wastewater treatment for the City. The OCSD treatment plant has capacity to serve the <br />project's projected wastewater generation, which is 7,440 gallons per day or less. <br />Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, (EIR, p. 5 -100.) <br />2, Impact: Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or <br />wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of <br />which could cause significant environmental effects? <br />Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -99 through 5 -101; January 2014 EIR <br />Attachment, p. 9.) <br />Analysis: OCSD is the service agency providing wastewater treatment for the City. The <br />OCSD treatment plant has capacity to serve the project's projected wastewater <br />generation, which is 7,440 gallons per day or less. The City is served by its own <br />municipal water system, with the majority of the water supply obtained from <br />groundwater and the remainder purchased from imported sources. The project would <br />18 "Exhibit A" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.