Laserfiche WebLink
HARBOR BLVD. MIXED USE TRANSIT CORRIDOR PLAN FINAL FIR <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />7. Alternatives to the Proposed Project <br />7.4.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />Past and present uses and activities within the project area have known or suspected contamination of soils. <br />Development and redevelopment in accordance with the NHSP would result in similar impacts to health and <br />safety impact related to the presence of known or suspected on site contamination. Future development has <br />the potential to be exposed to suspected sites, and demolition activities may expose construction workers to <br />asbestos containing materials or lead based paints. This alternative would result in the same impacts related to <br />hazards and hazardous materials as the proposed project. <br />7.4.7 Hydrology and Water Quality <br />The project area is currently developed. Development and redevelopment in accordance with the NHSP <br />would result in a similar amount of impervious surfaces as the proposed project. No changes to the volume <br />or velocity of stormwater would occur because the project area is built out and the area of impervious <br />surfaces is not expected to change. Short -term construction related and long -term water quality would be <br />similar to the proposed project since future projects under this alternative would be required to comply with <br />the Construction General Permit, requiring implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan <br />(SWPPP for projects one acre in size or more, and prepare a Water Quality Management Plan for all for all <br />projects that meet the thresholds. Therefore, this alternative would be less than significant with mitigation and <br />have similar hydrology and water quality impacts as the proposed project <br />7.4.8 Land Use and Planning <br />Unlike the proposed project, this alternative would not require a zoning ordinance amendment, a zone <br />change, or a General Plan amendment. However, this alternative would not meet the goals of the housing <br />element to the same degree because this alternative would not result in an increase in affordable housing <br />allowed on site. In addition, this alternative would not support the Iand Use Element Policy 2.4 to the same <br />degree as the project because it would not result in enhancements to the existing sidewalks. This alternative <br />would not provide a catalyst for revitalizing the corridor. As a result, impacts related to land use would <br />greater, but less than significant. <br />Under this alternative, grading and construction noise would be similar to the proposed project since <br />development would continue to be allowed in accordance with the NHSP. Stationary noise sources associated <br />with new commercial development would have the potential to increase noise levels at adjacent properties, <br />similar to the proposed project. Operational traffic related noise would be less since this alternative would <br />generate less vehicle trips. Overall, noise impacts would be less than the proposed project. <br />7.4.10 Population and Housing <br />Population and housing impacts would be increased by this alternative. This alternative would result in <br />approximately 10,000 employees due to the increase in approximately 4.9 million square feet of commercial <br />uses. This alternative would allow 320 residential units. As a result, the jobs - housing balance for the project <br />Page 76 PlaceWorkr <br />