Laserfiche WebLink
HARBOR BLVD. MIXED USE TRANSIT CORRIDOR PLAN FINAL FIR <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />7. Alternatives to the Proposed Project <br />area would be extremely jobs -rich and not in balance with the City overall. The jobs housing ratio within the <br />NHSP area at buildout would be 31, far higher than the existing, already jobs -rich jobs - housing ratio of 1.87 <br />in the City of Santa Ana in 2010. As a result, impacts would be greater than the proposed project. <br />7.4.11 Public Services <br />Total development intensity in square feet would be lower in this alternative: assuming the 345 residential <br />units permitted by this alternative averaged 1,500 square feet, the units would total about 518,000 square feet. <br />Total permitted development would be about 5.52 million square feet including five million square feet of <br />nonresidential development. In the proposed project, 4,623 permitted residential units at an average of 1,500 <br />square feet per unit gives a total of 6.93 million square feet of housing units, and a total of 8.90 million <br />square feet including permitted nonresidential land uses. Thus, demands for police and fire protection would <br />be somewhat lower in this alternative. Demands for public services dependent on population, including <br />schools, parks, and libraries would be lower in this alternative due to the reduction of proposed residential <br />units. <br />7.4.12 Recreation <br />Compared to the proposed project, this alternative would generate fewer residents in the project area. Fewer <br />residents would generate reduced demand for recreational facilities and services. Furthermore, the <br />deterioration of existing parks and recreational facilities would be reduced. Therefore, impacts related to <br />recreation would be reduced under this alternative and would remain less than significant. <br />7.4.13 Transportation and Traffic <br />Bailout of this alternative would generate slightly less vehicle trips on study area roadways as compared to <br />the proposed project. Buildout of the NHSP land uses would generate 41,802 daily trips, while buildout of <br />the project would generate 54,357 daily trips. The alternative would generate 12,555 fewer trips at buildout. <br />This would result in a significant impact to the following intersections: <br />• Euclid St and Edinger Ave — LOS F (AM Peak Hour) <br />• Harbor Blvd and Trask Ave — LOS E (AM Peak Hour) <br />• Harbor Blvd and Hazard Ave — LOS E (AM Peak Hour) <br />• Fairview St and 17� St — LOS E/F (AM and PM Peak Hour) <br />• Fairview St and V St — LOS F (PM Peak Hour) <br />Similar to the proposed project, all 15 study roadway segments are forecast to operate at an acceptable level <br />of service E or better with buildout of the NHSP. However, this alternative would not involve the <br />development of improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the project area that would be developed by the <br />proposed project. Overall, transportation and traffic impacts of this alternative would be slightly less than <br />those of the proposed project. <br />October 2014 Page 7 -7 <br />