My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65B - PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE ADJ
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
12/02/2014
>
65B - PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE ADJ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2014 8:46:02 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 3:35:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
65B
Date
12/2/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana, CA I WATER RATE STUDY <br />Figure -6: Projected Revenues and Revenue Requirements – Status Quo: No Revenue Increases [ *] <br />a us uo: Projected Revenue and Revenue Requirements <br />$80,000 in $000's <br />$70,000 <br />$60,000 <br />$50,000 <br />$40,000 <br />$30,000 <br />$20,000 <br />$10,000 <br />$0 <br />- $10,000 <br />FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 <br />� O &M Expenses ® Water Purchase 6...d Annual Capital Outlay <br />® Debt service � Capital Projects -01ho-Revenue <br />Target Cash Balance —*--Cash Balance <br />[ *I FY 14/15 revenues include one -time receipt of funds from water bond refinancing activities. <br />In the event that the City should elect to delay CIP activities, it does allow the Water Enterprise to <br />stretch out available cash; however, continued deferral of needed CIP projects also increases the <br />probability, consequence and cost of asset failure. As a rough approximation, Black & Veatch estimated <br />the cost of continuing to defer CIP projects using the methodology set forth in the American Society of <br />Civil Engineers' (ASCE's) 2012 Failure to Act Economic Report for Water (FAE Report). The FAC Report <br />notes that in addition to the actual repair /replacement costs, there are costs associated with payment <br />of claims to impacted households and businesses. Additionally, if projects are deferred by several years, <br />there is an economic loss due to lost water supply, loss of jobs, lost work days, business closures, traffic <br />delays, street repairs, etc. Table 12 summarizes the cost of not executing the proposed CIP using the FAE <br />Report methodology. Table 12 does not include the cost of replacing the asset. <br />Table -12: Economic Impacts of Delaying the Proposed CIP <br />Households $366,000 - $1,314,600 <br />Businesses $917,100 - $3,286,500 <br />Local Economy $4,463,100 - $15,994,300 <br />Total $5,747,000 - $20,595,400 <br />BLACK &VEATCH Water Fate Study <br />M Ll • <br />Total household claim payments. <br />Total business claim payments. <br />Range depends on the severity of breaks. <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.