|
The fee program share of Corridor Cost shown below represents an
<br />estimate of the share attributable to new development. It is expected
<br />that this share may change as future revisions are made to the fees.
<br />TABLE VIII -1
<br />FEE PROGRAM SHARE OF CORRIDOR COST
<br />B. Determination of Base Fee
<br />The cost attributable to future development must be reduced to a fee
<br />so that it may be apportioned in an equitable manner to specific types
<br />of development. Allocation of the cost on the basis of trip end
<br />generation by general land use category is proposed, where: I
<br />S
<br />cost apportioned to future development in the AOB zone
<br />v
<br />cost /trip end trip end growth in the AOB zone
<br />SJHTC F /ETC
<br />Zone A 597,856,775 . $74/TE $133,096,091 . $80/TV-
<br />1,321,160 1,665,922
<br />Zone B $67,643,330 ■ $46/TE $117,131,975 . $43/TE
<br />1,462,093 2,730,731
<br />The data used in computing the average cost per trip end are
<br />summarized in Exhibit IX and X. The trip end generation factors used
<br />im the calculation were derived from the EMA Trip Generation Rates,
<br />shown in Exhibit XI. The projected growth in dwelling units was taken
<br />from the respective San Joaquin Bills and Foothill Transportation
<br />Corridor studies. Projected growth in industrial /commercial floor
<br />space was generated from MMTS II4 employment projections.
<br />4Employment-projects adopted by the Orange County Transportation Commission.
<br />-16-
<br />Total Corridor
<br />Developers
<br />Developers
<br />Costs (S)
<br />Share (%)
<br />Share (S)
<br />SJHTC
<br />Zone A
<br />28.6%
<br />$ 97,856,775
<br />Zone B
<br />19.88
<br />$ 67,643,330
<br />Total
<br />$341,660,000
<br />48.4%
<br />$165,500,104
<br />F /ETC
<br />,
<br />Zone A
<br />25.8%
<br />$133,096,091
<br />Zone B
<br />22.7%
<br />$117,131,975
<br />Total
<br />$516,147,000
<br />48.5%
<br />$250,228,066
<br />B. Determination of Base Fee
<br />The cost attributable to future development must be reduced to a fee
<br />so that it may be apportioned in an equitable manner to specific types
<br />of development. Allocation of the cost on the basis of trip end
<br />generation by general land use category is proposed, where: I
<br />S
<br />cost apportioned to future development in the AOB zone
<br />v
<br />cost /trip end trip end growth in the AOB zone
<br />SJHTC F /ETC
<br />Zone A 597,856,775 . $74/TE $133,096,091 . $80/TV-
<br />1,321,160 1,665,922
<br />Zone B $67,643,330 ■ $46/TE $117,131,975 . $43/TE
<br />1,462,093 2,730,731
<br />The data used in computing the average cost per trip end are
<br />summarized in Exhibit IX and X. The trip end generation factors used
<br />im the calculation were derived from the EMA Trip Generation Rates,
<br />shown in Exhibit XI. The projected growth in dwelling units was taken
<br />from the respective San Joaquin Bills and Foothill Transportation
<br />Corridor studies. Projected growth in industrial /commercial floor
<br />space was generated from MMTS II4 employment projections.
<br />4Employment-projects adopted by the Orange County Transportation Commission.
<br />-16-
<br />
|