Laserfiche WebLink
The direct and indirect factors were used to identify the relative benefits <br />between the A and B zones. The portion of fee program share representing <br />direct benefit was divided between the A and B zones based upon the <br />percentage of corridor user trips due to growth within each zone. The portion of <br />developers share representing indirect benefit was distributed between the A and <br />B zones based upon the percentage of total trip ends on the transportation <br />system within each zone. The fees for the A and B Zones, therefore, include a <br />measure of both direct and indirect benefits received by each zone. Exhibits VII <br />and VIII show the method in which these calculations were made. <br />The fee program share of the original estimate of Corridor Cost shown below <br />represents an estimate of the share attributable to new development. It is <br />expected that this share may change as future revisions are made to the fees. <br />(As of January, 1991, shares were 48.44% for the SJHTC, and 48.48% for the <br />F/ETC. The 1997 SJHTCA Findings and the 1997 F/ETCA Findings set forth <br />additional facts related to the estimated corridor costs and the portion allocated <br />to new development through the MT &B fee program, updated as of June, 1997.) <br />223512_2.DOC 20 <br />