Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br />DECEMBER 16, 2014 <br />TITLE: <br />M MR <br />MAINTENANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR <br />POWER WASHING AND SWEEPING AT THE <br />SANTA ANA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION <br />CENTER (SPEC. NO. 14079) <br />T��G <br />(STRA AN N 1, C <br />Jr C TY MANAG <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />APPROVED <br />❑ As Recommended <br />❑ As Amended <br />❑ Ordinance on 1 "Reading <br />❑ Ordinance on 2n'Reading <br />❑ Implementing Resolution <br />❑ Set Public Hearing For_ <br />CONTINUED TO <br />FILE NUMBER <br />Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with TSCM <br />Corporation, subject to nonsubstantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, <br />to provide power washing and sweeping services at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation <br />Center, for a two -year period ending December 31, 2016, with two one -year renewal options <br />exercisable by the City Manager, in an amount not to exceed $40,700 annually, which includes a <br />$5,000 contingency. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) is a transit hub that offers Amtrak, <br />Metrolink, Orange County Transit Authority, and other bus and taxi services, with nearly 3,000 <br />commuters passing through each day. The SARTC is also home to State and County social <br />service providers, the City's WORK Center, and several commercial businesses. The City <br />maintains this facility for the traveling public, SARTC visitors, and tenants. <br />A Request for Proposals (RFP) for power washing and sweeping services was advertised on <br />November 6, 2014, on the City's online bid management and publication system. Additionally, 11 <br />companies were notified of the business opportunity. Below is a summary of the proposals <br />solicited and received: <br />11 Vendors notified <br />3 Bids received <br />0 Bids received from Santa Ana vendors <br />The proposals received were rated by a team from the Public Works and Finance & Management <br />agencies. They were evaluated according to the firms' experience, understanding of the scope of <br />work, references, and proposed fee. TSCM Corporation received the highest average score of <br />92. The ratings and fees for all proposals are as follows: <br />25D -1 <br />