Laserfiche WebLink
Response PH1 -16 — Ruby Cardenas <br />The EA /DEIR equally assessed Streetcar Alternative 1 along 4 "' Street and Streetcar Alternative 2 <br />along 5`h Street. <br />Response PH1 -17 — Ruby Cardenas <br />The comment requesting an attractive streetcar system was forwarded to the decision makers <br />for consideration. The comment is not directly related to the content or adequacy of the <br />EA /DEIR, and no further response is necessary. <br />Response PH1 -18 — Raul Yenez <br />Section 2.9 on page 2 -29 of the EA/DEIR describes the public outreach for the development of <br />alternatives, scoping, and circulation of the EA /DEIR. Section 3.5 on page 3 -61 of the EA /DEIR <br />discusses additional public outreach in relation to targeting populations of EJ concern. The City <br />has confirmed that notices were sent to multiple properties owned by the commenter. See <br />Response PH1 -1 related to community outreach and distribution of notices for a detailed <br />description of how the project complied with the CEQA and Council on Environmental Quality <br />(CEQ) Guidelines regarding noticing and public involvement. <br />Response PH 1-19 — Raul Yenez <br />The support for the Streetcar Alternative 2 was forwarded to the decision makers for <br />consideration. See Response PH1 -2(1) related to construction impacts. See Response PH1 -15 for <br />effects along 4`" Street. A comprehensive community outreach program would be developed prior <br />to the start of construction activities. For business owners and commercial property owners, the <br />disruption of construction activities would involve multiple construction crews operating along the <br />corridor simultaneously. As stated on page 3 -202 of the EA/DEIR, access to businesses would be <br />maintained during operating hours. In addition, the second sentence in the second to last <br />paragraph on page 3 -202 of the EA/DEIR has been revised to state that signage would be posted <br />to alert customers that businesses are open during construction and wayfinding to businesses <br />whose access is disrupted. Signs would also be posted alerting nearby businesses of temporary <br />lane reductions, weekend or nighttime closures, and /or detours. Construction would be <br />completed in coordination with Downtown stakeholders and the business community in order to <br />minimize potential impacts from construction, such as coordinating nighttime and weekend work. <br />In addition, early construction plans call for the Downtown alignment to be constructed at the <br />beginning of the construction process to limit impacts to businesses. <br />Response PH 1 -20 — Tish Leon <br />The public meetings during the 45 -day review period of the EA/DEIR served as a forum for <br />recording public comments and receiving testimony on the project and EA/DEIR, and not as a <br />forum in which the City answered questions or engaged in a dialogue with the public. All <br />comments made at the time of the meetings were recorded to become part of the administrative <br />record for the project; these oral comments have been included in this REA/FEIR, for which a <br />response to each comment has been provided. <br />Santa Ana-Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project REAIFEIR P a g e1200 <br />January 2015 <br />75A -258 <br />