Laserfiche WebLink
immediately sent to the scene once the dispatcher has obtained sufficient information regarding <br />the nature of the call. <br />Priority 1 calls for service. The data points assessed are from the time the call is answered by the <br />dispatcher to the time the officer is en route to the scene. Since these are Priority 1 calls for service, <br />it is expected that the time between these two data points is small. However, before assessing the <br />data, an adjustment must be made for call-taking time. Once the dispatcher answers the 911 call, <br />there is a period of time in which the dispatcher is obtaining sufficient information before the <br />dispatcher can get an officer en route to the scene. This information includes the nature of the <br />incident, location, and other pertinent information. <br />Since there is not a field within the computer aided dispatch system to definitely determine if a <br />Priority 1 call is being held due to a lack of patrol personnel availability, the research team needed <br />to establish a time standard. After discussion with SAPD command staff and personnel a standard <br />of 80 seconds was established. It was determined that if a Priority 1 call was not dispatched within <br />80 seconds of being answered, it was typically being held because no officer was available to <br />handle the call. In applying this standard, it was determined that 34.32% of the Priority 1 calls <br />for service in 2013 took 81 or more seconds to dispatch. <br />What accounts for the excessive hold time in dispatch for 35% of the Priority 1 calls received by <br />SAPD. Some of the excess hold time in dispatch is probably due to shift changes. It is a constant <br />challenge in most law enforcement agencies to keep up with the call volume during shift change. <br />Some of the excess hold time in dispatch may be due to inefficient processes within dispatch and <br />patrol such as the unwillingness to preempt an officer on a lunch break to respond to a Priority 1 <br />call for service. However, the magnitude of the problem leads the research team to the conclusion <br />The strategic staffing <br />that the excessive hold time is due largely to insufficient staffing in patrol. <br />plan for patrol that is described later in this report will focus significantly on increasing the <br />immediate availability of officers and decreasing the hold time in dispatch for Priority 1 calls for <br />service. <br /> <br />Critical Issue #2: Excessive Response Time to Priority 1 Calls for Service <br />Excessive response time to Priority 1 calls for service was identified as the second critical issue <br />facing SAPD patrol. The first critical issue focused on insufficient immediate availability for <br />Priority 1 calls. These two issues may sound similar, but they are, in fact, distinct from one <br />another. The calculation of the immediately availability factor ends once an officer is dispatched <br />to a Priority 1 call and that is when response time begins to be calculated. Response times are <br />measured from the time an officer is dispatched to the call for service to arrival at the scene. <br />Basically, the hold time described in the first critical issue is excluded in calculating the response <br />time to Priority 1 calls for service. <br />Ќ <br /> <br /> <br />