My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25C - AGMT - HOUSING SRVS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
02/17/2015
>
25C - AGMT - HOUSING SRVS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2015 4:47:41 PM
Creation date
2/12/2015 4:22:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
25C
Date
2/17/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CSO Advisors Incorporated January 28, 2015 <br />Proposal: Housing Financial Analytical and Advisory Services Page 11 of 25 <br />Example: City of San Francisco Hunters View. Redevelopment of the Hunters <br />View public housing, one of the first of the City's HOPE SF public housing <br />redevelopment project, was faced with significant financial challenges, including potential <br />sources of funding based on using the City's annual HOPE SF pledge. On behalf of the <br />Mayor's Office of Housing, we analyzed the options and feasibility for structuring City <br />funds for the multiple phases of the project - including bridge financing needs, ultimate <br />takeout sources, use of certificates of participation by the City and County and ultimate <br />resources for such repayment, use of tax increment and security for special State <br />infrastructure grant. We then served as financial advisor on the first phase of Hunters <br />View bonds. <br />Placements with Major Banks. In the last 5 years, we have helped structure more than 50 private <br />placements with major banks, including Wells, Cid, US Bank, BofA and many others. These are <br />typically designed on a drawdown basis to avoid any negative arbitrage. <br />Short -Term Tax-Exempt Bonds Taken Out by GNMA Securities or Freddie Mac. We have <br />assisted numerous issuers in'designing and imnpleaienting sharf -term tax-exempt bond that (a) qualify <br />for 4% Low Income Housing Tax Credits, (b) utilize very low -cost cash - collateralized tax- exempt <br />construction financing (c) minimize negative arbitrage and (d) provide permanent financing through the <br />GNMA market or Freddie Mac at long -term rates well below 4% in past months. A key concern we <br />have assisted issuers with is designing its compensation structure so that it receives a reasonable total <br />return on the transaction despite the short period of time in which the bonds are outstanding. <br />Understanding of 4% Tax Credits. Since access to tax credits is the main reason developers use <br />multi- family bends in &e first place, ottr kwwledpe of such credits a— the amount of bonds needed to <br />meet the 50% test, how long bonds need to be outstanding, how they are used in acquisition - <br />rehabilitation and new construction, how bridge debt is arranged - enables its to work very <br />knowledgeably and efficiently for CSCDA. As an example of our experience, we structured the three <br />-- <br />largest tax credit raises in the history of the program- $35 million for San Francisco's North Beach, <br />$210 million for modernizing 33 public housing projects in Puerto Rico, and $230 million for 21,000 <br />units in New York City. <br />Bonds for Preservation Projects. We have served as financial advisor on more than 100 preservation <br />projects including a portfolio of ten projects for the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, the City of <br />Los Angeles, and the San Diego Housing Commission. These projects included expiring Section -236 <br />mortgages where the developer desired to continue the interest reduction payments (IRP) under either <br />236(b) (where the 236 note remains outstanding and is held by a public agency) or 236(e) (where note is <br />paid off and de-coupled from the IRP). These financings also included bonds secured by tax - credits, <br />interest reduction payments (IRP) and, in the San Francisco transactions, bonds secured by Section -8 <br />rents above tax - credit rents. CSO also served as financial advisor on CHFA's purchase of California's <br />Section -236 portfolio from Fannie Mae. <br />Refundings. We have completed multifamily bond.refundings ' on more than 200 multifamily projects. <br />California clients include Orange, Los Angeles, and Alameda Counties and the cities of Los Angeles, <br />Fremont, Livermore, Santa Rosa, Anaheim, Vallejo, the San Diego Housing Commission and the Santa <br />Cruz County Housing Authority. <br />On behalf of these clients, we have helped establish and implement clear refunding guidelines, <br />procedures for analyzing default refunding requests and new regulatory policies. For example, Orange <br />County has successfully obtained conversion of half of the units rented to persons below 80% of median <br />25C -56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.