My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25F - AGMT - CROSSING GUARDS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
02/17/2015
>
25F - AGMT - CROSSING GUARDS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2015 5:27:07 PM
Creation date
2/12/2015 5:08:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Police
Item #
25F
Date
2/17/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agreement with All City Management Services <br />February 17, 2015 <br />Page 2 <br />In 2014, the Traffic Division conducted a review of the 72 crossing guard positions in the City. The <br />review included evaluating the 'Warrant Sheet' for a crossing guard /traffic signal crossing by Public <br />Works; analyzing traffic collision data; site surveys of the locations, and a personal interview with the <br />crossing guards. <br />The following factors were also considered in the analysis: <br />1.) Several warrant sheets recommended one crossing guard, but there were additional crossing <br />guards assigned; <br />2.) Some crossing guards were in close proximity to others; <br />3.) There was an overhead tri -phase signal or a marked crosswalk with sufficient street signage; <br />4.) The collision data involving pedestrians at most locations was relatively low, or the data did not <br />support collisions were occurring during school hours; <br />5.) Some crossing guards interviewed indicated pedestrian traffic was minimal; <br />6.) Children were crossing major streets to attend school despite the fact there was <br />another school in closer proximity or in the same residential tract. <br />As a result of this assessment, the Traffic Division has been able to accurately determine the best <br />locations to assign crossing guards. The assessment determined that crossing guards were warranted <br />at 49 locations, a decrease from the previous 72 locations. This reduction will result in an annual <br />savings of approximately $207,300. <br />The cost for the new three -year agreement is as follows: <br />Year 1 (March 1, 2015 - Feb. 28, 2016) <br />$615,978 (Minimum wage increase as of 01- <br />01-16 reflected <br />Year 2 March 1, 2016 — Feb. 29, 2017 <br />$656,000 Minimum wage increase reflected <br />Year 3 (March 1, 2017 — Feb. 28, 2018) <br />$656,000 (Minimum wage increase reflected) <br />Total <br />$1,927,978 <br />An additional 15% has been added for unanticipated services, for a total three -year agreement <br />amount of $2,217,175. <br />STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT <br />Approval of this item allows the City to meet Goal #1 - Community Safety, Objective #1, Modernize <br />the Community Policing Philosophy to improve customer service, crime prevention and traffic / <br />pedestrian /bicycle safety. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Funds in the amount of $2,217,175 are available in the Police Department, Traffic Division Other <br />Contractual Services Account (account no. 01114405 62300). Funds for FY 2015 -16 and FY <br />2016 -17 will be appropriated during the annual budget process. <br />APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: <br />�fJ�wa AA'�l �a <br />Francisco Gutierrez <br />Executive Director <br />Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency,/ <br />Exhibit 1: Agreement <br />25F -2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.