My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55A - RESO - EMPG
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
03/03/2015
>
55A - RESO - EMPG
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2015 3:34:31 PM
Creation date
2/26/2015 3:31:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Police
Item #
55A
Date
3/3/2015
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Funding may be used for the sustainnnom of core capabilities that, while they may <br />not be physically deployable, support national response capabilities such as <br />Geographic /Geospatial Information Systems (GIS), interoperable communications <br />systems, capabilities as defined under the mitigation mission area of the Goal, and <br />fusion centers. <br />Unallowable costs <br />Certain cost items are prohibited under the EMPG Program. <br />For more details on allowable and unallowable direct costs please refer to <br />Appendix B —FY 2014 EMPG Funding Guidelines. <br />iii. Indirect Cosh <br />Indirect costs are allowable under this program, but only if the applicant has an <br />approved indirect cost rate agreement with their cognizant Federal agency. A <br />copy of the approved rate (a fully executed, agreement negotiated with the <br />applicant's cognizant federal agency) is required at the time of application. <br />iv. Other Cost Requirements <br />SAFECOM <br />Grantees (including sub - recipients) who receive awards under the EMPG that <br />wholly or partially provide funding for emergency communication projects and <br />related activities should comply with the most recent version of the SAFECOM <br />Guidance on Emergency Communications Grants <br />hC /hvww.safecornnroUram 2ov /erant /Default nsPx. This Guidance provides <br />recommendations to grantees regarding interoperable emergency communications <br />projects, including allowable costs, eligible activities, grants management best <br />practices for emergency communications grants, and information on technical <br />standards that ensure greater interoperability. The Guidance is intended to ensure <br />that Federally- funded investments are compatible, interoperable, and support the <br />national goals and objectives for improving emergency communications <br />nationwide. Grantees (including sub- recipients) investing in broadband - related <br />investments should review IB 386: Clarification on Use of DHS/FEMA Public <br />Safety Grant Funds for Broadband- Related Expenditures and Investments, and <br />consult their FEMA Regional Program Manager on such Investments before <br />developing applications. Relocating existing systems operating in the T -Band is <br />also allowable. <br />Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance <br />As a Federal agency, FEMA is required to consider the effects of its actions on <br />the environment and /or historic properties to ensure that all activities and <br />programs funded by the agency, including grants- funded projects, comply with <br />Federal EIIP regulations, laws and Executive Orders as applicable. Grantees and <br />sub - grantees proposing projects that have the potential to impact the environment, <br />including but not limited to construction of communication towers, modification <br />or renovation of existing buildings, structures and facilities, or new construction <br />including replacement of facilities, must participate in the FEMA, EHP review <br />11 <br />FY 2014 EMPG Program <br />55A -20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.