My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH - BRISTOL EIR FROM WARNER TO ST. ANDREW
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2015
>
04/07/2015
>
75C - PH - BRISTOL EIR FROM WARNER TO ST. ANDREW
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 3:32:45 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 4:21:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75C
Date
4/7/2015
Destruction Year
2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
918
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The development of mass transit system which utilizes the Bristol Street .. <br />Corridor as an alternative to widening the street, was rejected for the <br />following reasons: <br />i. An elevated fixed guideway or other AGT system along Bristol <br />Street would not relieve the current and projected traffic <br />congestion on the street, unless the entire corridor is developed <br />into a cohesive and integrated activity center that would line into <br />other subregional centers. Such a redevelopment program at .. <br />best, would take many terms to complete, as the City's <br />Redevelopment Agency has only recently adopted a plan for the <br />areas and funds for property acquisition and redevelopment will -, <br />accumulate gradually over the next 20 years or so. The project <br />and traffic congestion problems require immediate rather than <br />long -range improvements. <br />2. The Main Street alignment is the, preferred alignment for such a <br />transit facility in this area, since it would link existing and <br />projected activity centers more effectively. This is the adopted <br />alignment in the Orange County Transit Strategy. <br />Bristol Street is an urban arterial highway providing access to a large <br />number of commercial and residential uses. Eliminating left -rum lanes <br />and left-turn movements and /or the use of reversible flow lanes _would <br />be inconsistent with the characteristics and usage of this type of r <br />roadway, the City's Circulation Element, and the County of Orange , <br />Transportation Element, Therefore, these options were not considered <br />as project alternatives, + <br />D. NO -PRO] CT ALTERNATWE <br />The No- Project alternative would essentially involve no new efforts to modify <br />or improve the subject segment of Bristol Street and the various intersections <br />within the project limits. Already programmed improvements would occur in + <br />accordance with existing City plans. Only minor repairs and modifications <br />would occur, incrementally as new development takes place. Existing <br />conditions with respect to traffic movement, noise, air quality, drainage, +' <br />socioeconomics, aesthetics, land use, utilities, neighborhood character, etc., <br />would remain essentially the same, with changes taking place slowly in <br />response to private development activity and increasing traffic congestion. <br />R-2a <br />75C -69 '� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.