Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br />APRIL 21, 2015 <br />TITLE: <br />AGREEMENT WITH ALL CITY <br />MANAGEMENT SERVICES <br />FOR ADULT CROSSING <br />GUARD PROGRAM <br />(STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 1, 1) <br />\ CITY MANAGER <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />CLERIC OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />APPROVED <br />❑ As Recommended <br />❑ As Amended <br />❑ Ordinance on I" Reading <br />❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading <br />Implementing Resolution <br />Set Public Hearing For _ <br />CONTINUED TO <br />FILE NUMBER <br />Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute a three -year agreement with All <br />City Management Services Inc. (ACMS) to provide an Adult Crossing Program, in an amount not <br />to exceed $1,927,678 with an additional 18% contingency if needed, subject to non - substantive <br />changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, <br />PUSLIC SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE9 MEETING RECOMMENDATION <br />At the regularly scheduled meeting on March 24, 2015, the Public Safety Council Committee <br />members reached consensus to move consideration of the All City Management Services <br />agreement to the full Council for consideration. <br />DISCUSSION <br />In December 2014, the City issued Request for Proposals (RFP 14 -090) for Adult Crossing Guard <br />services to ensure the safe movement of elementary school children around school zones within <br />the City of Santa Ana. Currently, the Crossing Guard Program provides crossing guard services <br />to three school districts, which includes 38 schools, with a total of 49 crossing guards throughout <br />the City. <br />Two vendors responded to the RFP; All City Management Services and Securitas, An evaluation <br />committee consisting of representatives from PD Traffic and PO Administrative Services reviewed <br />and rated the two proposals. The proposals were evaluated according to Responsiveness to <br />RFP �20 %a), Experience of Firm and Personnel (40 %) and Cost of Proposal (40 %), as stated in <br />the R P. The results of the evaluation are as follows: <br />Vendor <br />Score <br />All City Management Svcs, <br />_ <br />378 <br />Securitas - <br />354 <br />400 points max <br />25A -1 <br />