Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.10 Land Use and Planning <br />This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, <br />subsection A, Landfonn Modification, of the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />(a) Physically divide an established community? <br />The project area is developed with various urban uses and the proposed widening would not divide an <br />established community. Although there would be partial and full takes, the project would not create a <br />physical barrier to separate a community. The proposed project would not introduce any significant land use <br />impacts than previously analyzed. No significant impact would result from the project implementation. <br />Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />(b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction <br />over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal <br />program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />environmental effect? <br />The proposed project would not result in changes to the land use designation of the acquired parcels. The <br />proposed project is in compliance with the existing designation and would not create a new conflict. No <br />significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />(c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community <br />conservation plan? <br />The project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan. The project site is already fully developed and <br />the proposed widening would not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community. No <br />impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.11 Mineral Resources <br />This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, <br />subsection W, Consumption of Renewable and Non - Renewable Resources of the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />(a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the <br />region and the residents of the state? <br />The project site is currently developed and does not contain any areas for the extraction of mineral <br />resources. The proposed project would not involve excavation that would likely identify previously <br />ANA 305 -194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 43 <br />