Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) <br />The proposed project is an intersection widening project and would not generate demands for public <br />facilities. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.15 Recreation <br />This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, <br />subsection P, Impact on Recreational Facilities, of the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />(a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur <br />or be accelerated? <br />The proposed project is not a growth- inducing project and would not create demand for recreation services. <br />Physical deterioration of recreational facilities would not result from the proposed intersection widening and <br />no impact would result from the project implementation. No mitigation measures are required with regards <br />to recreational resources. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />(b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? <br />The proposed intersection widening would not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities <br />and no adverse physical impact would be generated. No mitigation measures are required. Impacts would be <br />similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.16 Transportation /Traffic <br />This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, <br />subsections U, Impacts to Transportation Facilities, and V, Construction Impacts of the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. <br />(a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for <br />the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation <br />including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation <br />system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian <br />and bicycle paths, and mass transit. <br />The Bristol Street Widening Phase IV project is consistent with the applicable plans, ordinances and policies <br />establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system as described in the 1990 <br />Final EIS /EIR. The widening of Bristol Street was designated in the Orange County Master 'Plan, and was <br />recommended in the Bristol Street Corridor Study — Final Report by Mohle, Grover & Associates in 1983. It <br />was also recommended in the Arterial Highway Element — Santa Ana Element — Santa Ana Transportation <br />Corridor State II Alternative Analysis prepared by Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., in 1983. <br />The proposed widening is also in agreement with the recommendation found in the Intercity Liaison <br />Committee — Five -Year Transportation Study Update to 1990 prepared by Basmaeiyan- Darnell, Inc., in <br />ANA 305 -194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 51 <br />