My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ORANGE, COUNTY OF (34) - 2015
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
O
>
ORANGE, COUNTY OF
>
ORANGE, COUNTY OF (34) - 2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2017 9:57:47 AM
Creation date
5/14/2015 1:53:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
ORANGE, COUNTY OF
Contract #
A-2015-038
Agency
POLICE
Council Approval Date
3/3/2015
Expiration Date
3/2/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix l3 - FY 2014 EMPG Funding Guidelines <br />Allowable Costs <br />Management and Administration (M &A) <br />M &A activities are those defined as directly relating to the management and administration of <br />EMPG Program funds, such as financial management and monitoring. It should be noted that <br />salaries of State and local emergency managers are not typically categorized as M &A, unless the <br />State or local EMA chooses to assign personnel to specific M &A activities. <br />If the SAA is not the EMA, the SAA is not eligible to retain fiends for M &A. M &A costs are <br />allowable for both State and local -level ENIAs, The State EMA may use up to five percent (5 %) <br />for M &A purposes. In addition, local EMAs may retain and use up to five percent (5 %) of the <br />amount received from the State for local M &A purposes. <br />Indirect Costs <br />Indirect costs are allowable only if the applicant has an approved indirect cost rate with the <br />cognizant Federal agency. A copy of the approved rate (a fully executed, agreement negotiated <br />with the applicant's cognizant Federal agency) is required at the thne of application. Indirect <br />costs will be evaluated as part of the application for Federal funds to determine if allowable and <br />reasonable. <br />Planning <br />Planning spans all five National Preparedness Goal (the Goal) mission areas and provides a <br />baseline for determining potential threats and hazards, required capabilities, required resources, <br />and establishes a framework for roles and responsibilities. Planning provides a methodical way <br />to engage the whole community in the development of a strategic, operational, and/or <br />community -based approach to preparedness. <br />EMPG Program finds may be used to develop or enhance upon emergency management <br />planning activities, some examples include: <br />• Development of THIRA <br />• Development of an atl- hazards mitigation plan based on identified risks and hazards <br />Emergency Management/Operation Plans <br />• Maintaining a current EOP that is aligned with guidelines set out in CPG 101v.2 <br />http:// vvlvw. enm .gov /natior2crl- prepcar ^cdness /plan <br />• Modifying existing incident management and emergency operations plans <br />• Developing /enhancing large -scale and catastrophic event incident plans <br />Communications Plans <br />• Developing and updating Statewide Communication Interoperability Plans <br />• Developing and updating Tactical Interoperability Communications Plans <br />28 <br />Appendix B- FY 2014 EMPG Program Funding Guidelines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.