Laserfiche WebLink
�6 chapter 1 Introduction <br />gas (GHG) emissions. GHG emissions have <br />the potential to adversely affect the environ- <br />ment because they contribute, on a cumula- <br />tive basis, to climate change. Climate change <br />is increasing the weather- related risks faced <br />by communities across the country, including <br />Santa Ana. Major risks to southern California <br />inland areas include extreme heat waves, <br />which can impact both human health and <br />infrastructure, and a less reliable water supply. <br />Legislative overview <br />State -level policies in California serve as <br />regulatory drivers for action at the local <br />government level. California has adopted a <br />wide variety of regulations aimed at reducing <br />the state's GHG emissions. Key legislation <br />pertaining to California GHG reduction targets <br />is described below. <br />f <br />. e . l <br />IZZMEM <br />California passed the Global Warming Solu- <br />tions Act, also known as Assembly Bill 32 (AB <br />32), in 2005. This bill charged the California <br />Air Resources Board (CARB) with implement- <br />ing a comprehensive statewide program to <br />reduce GHG emissions. AB 32 established the <br />following GHG emissions reduction targets for <br />the state of California: <br />• 2000 levels by 2010 <br />• 1990 levels by 2020 <br />These targets apply to statewide emissions <br />across all sectors of the economy. AB 32 does <br />not require that individual local governments <br />reduce their community emissions to these <br />levels nor does it require that local govern- <br />ments adopt climate action plans. However, <br />the AB 32 Scoping Plan, prepared by CARB <br />to map out strategies for reaching the AB 32 <br />targets, does identify an important role for lo- <br />cal governments in implementing many of the <br />strategies. <br />While impacts are now beginning to appear, <br />they are projected to intensify throughout the <br />twenty -first century, with costly consequences <br />if no action is taken. To slow down and ulti- <br />mately reverse climate change, organizations <br />in every sector of the economy and all levels <br />of government will need to implement new <br />policies to create more efficient, cleaner, and <br />safer communities. This CAP is the City's next <br />step along that path. <br />Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) enhances California's <br />ability to reach its AB 32 targets by promoting <br />good planning through its goal of develop- <br />ing more sustainable communities. SB 375 <br />requires CARB to develop regional GHG emis- <br />sions reduction targets for passenger ve- <br />hicles. CARB has established regional targets <br />for 2020 and 2035 for each region covered <br />by one of the state's 18 metropolitan plan- <br />ning organizations. The targets for the South- <br />ern California Association of Governments <br />(SLAG), where Santa Ana is located, are 8% <br />below 2005 levels by 2020, and 13% below <br />2005 levels by 2035. The Regional Council of <br />the Southern California Association of Gov- <br />ernments (SCAG) adopted the 2012 -2035 <br />Regional Transportation Plan /Sustainable <br />Communities Strategy (RTP /SCS): Towards <br />a Sustainable Future. Many of the measures <br />in this CAP help to implement strategies from <br />the RTP /SCS in the City of Santa Ana. <br />Executive Order S -3 -05 <br />Executive Order S -3 -05, issued by Governor <br />Schwarzenegger, reinforces the targets estab- <br />lished in both AB 32 and SB 375 and also sets <br />a schedule for reporting both the measured <br />impacts of climate change upon California's <br />natural environment and the emissions reduc- <br />tion efforts undertaken by a myriad of state, <br />regional, and local groups. Executive Order <br />S -3 -05 also establishes an additional GHG <br />75B -14 <br />