Laserfiche WebLink
Santa Arta Cifatate Action Plan <br />In addition to the retrofits from SCE programs, <br />natural gas retrofits were accomplished <br />through similar programs from the Southern <br />Table 1.2: SCG Program Impacts <br />California Gas Company (SCG). Those pro- <br />grams are reducing an estimated 8,362 MT- <br />0O2e /year and are summarized in Table 1.2. <br />Program Name <br />Annual Therms Saved <br />Emissions Reduced (MTCO,e /Year) <br />Commercial <br />1,019,806 <br />5,411 <br />Single Family <br />258,112 <br />1,370 <br />Multi Family <br />241,924 <br />1,284 <br />Mobile Home <br />55,931 <br />297 <br />Total <br />1,575,773. <br />8,362 <br />Weatherization is another program that has <br />reduced emissions from residential energy <br />use. The Weatherization program delivered <br />through the Community Action Partnership <br />and funded through Federal grants reached <br />3,291 low- income households with weather - <br />ization assistance since 2008. Actions taken <br />in homes can include combinations of a num- <br />ber of energy savings measures, such as seal- <br />ing air ducts, insulating, glazing windows, and <br />tuning up or replacing air conditioning and <br />heating equipment. The combined electric- <br />ity and natural gas savings from this program <br />result in an estimated emissions reduction of <br />1,553 MTCO2e /year. <br />Finally, new solar energy installations on <br />homes and businesses are also reducing <br />emissions. According to the Go -Solar Califor- <br />nia website, 11.9 MW of solar capacity has <br />been installed in Santa Ana since 2008. These <br />installations are estimated to produce an <br />emissions reduction of 5,751 MTCO2e /year.3 <br />Solid Waste, Water and Wastewater <br />The City of Santa Ana has an <br />exemplary recycling program AM <br />with an overall diversion rate <br />AM <br />of 67 %. A comparison of <br />diversion rates from 2008 and IV 51 <br />2011 shows an incremental <br />reduction of landfilled waste that translates <br />to an emissions reduction of 2,060 MTCOze/ <br />year.4 The most significant portion of the total <br />reduction is achieved from diversion of green <br />waste from the landfill, as this reduces a high <br />proportion of landfill emissions. <br />The extraction, delivery, and treatment of <br />water consume large amounts of energy. By <br />conserving water, energy consumption is <br />also reduced. Within the City of Santa Ana, <br />large volumes of water are conserved an- <br />nually through SoCal Water$mart and other <br />programs that provide incentives from the <br />Metropolitan Water District such as irriga- <br />tion controllers, ultra -low flush toilets, clothes <br />s It is likely that this number underestimates the total slightly due to the fact that Go -Solar California only tracks <br />installations that occurred as part of the California Solar Initiative rebate program. Total electricity generated from these <br />systems was calculated using the average annual kWh production per kW installed capacity of 1,678 for systems in the <br />South Coast Air District. <br />4 This assumes that the waste characterization (percentage of different waste types) and total generation in 2011 were the <br />same as those reported for 2008. <br />s For the calculation of this measure, water conserved was converted to energy consumption using the same values for <br />water use intensity as were used in the baseline inventory. Source: CEO. 2006, Refining Estimates of Water - Related <br />Energy Use in California prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. <br />9 The estimated energy intensity to supply recycled water in the Los Angeles area is 1,841 kWh /million gallons, compared <br />with 11,110 kWh /million gallons for potable water used in outdoor applications. Source: Navigant Consulting. 2008. The <br />Role of Recycled Water in Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Reduction. Table 4 -13 <br />75B -19 <br />