Laserfiche WebLink
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2015-01 <br />(WARNER INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY) <br />METHODOLOGY OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD <br />The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the <br />provisions of the Assessment Law, must be based on the special benefit that the <br />properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the <br />method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings, <br />The responsibility rests with the Assessment Engineer, who is retained for the purpose <br />of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the <br />assessment obligation. The City of Santa Ana has retained the services of Psomas as <br />Assessment Engineer for the project known as Assessment District No. 2015 -01 <br />(Warner Industrial Community). <br />The Assessment Engineer then makes his recommendation at the public hearing on the <br />Assessment District, and the final authority and decision rests with the City Council of <br />the City of Santa Ana. After hearing all testimony and evidence presented at that public <br />hearing, and upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council must make the final <br />decision determining whether or not the assessment spread has been made in direct <br />proportion to the special benefits received. <br />Analysis /Recommended Financing Mechanism <br />The City of Santa Ana is considering using assessment financing to improve the <br />pavement of the local, interior roadway network within the Warner Industrial Community <br />Assessment District (WIC), <br />The purpose of the assessment methodology is to determine the proportionate amount <br />of the assessment to be assessed to each parcel of land based on special benefits <br />received by each parcel. For purposes of this study the following options, which are <br />commonly used in the public finance industry, were considered: <br />1. Street Frontage. The street frontage Is defined as the length of the side of a <br />parcel that is directly adjacent to the street. The street frontage method is a direct <br />measure of the static utilization of each parcel and its corresponding special <br />benefit proposed from the street improvement. A common way of apportioning <br />costs to a parcel for assessment financing is to apply the cost based on the <br />street frontage. However, this methodology works best when the area under <br />consideration is comprised of parcels with mostly uniform depths, so that the <br />parcel sizes are fairly consistent with their street frontage. Examples of the size <br />versus frontage diversity in the Warner Industrial Community (WIC) is shown in <br />the following examples: two properties have approximately 30 feet of frontage <br />and one is 0.5 acres and the other is 2.8 acres; another two properties have <br />approximately 125 feet of frontage and one is 0.4 acres and the other is 1.2 <br />acres. Also, the WIC includes parcels that take access from private access <br />easements and therefore have no frontage on the improved roadways, but still <br />receive special benefit from the improvements. Another issue with this <br />methodology is that corner properties fronting on two interior streets would carry <br />17 <br />55B -35 <br />